In Reply to: Then why do you prefer the less accurate SS gear? posted by Don T on July 22, 2003 at 08:54:47:
"Since 'good' is a statement of your preferences I can only assume in assigning the rating of good to both amps you prefer colorations or the sound of the SS amp."I am not sure what you're saying here. I think you are saying I prefer the colorations of the "tube" amp to the sound of the solid-state amp. (The context could also mean "preferring colorations or sound of the SS amp over those of the tube amp.") Presuming my reading of this is correct, I guess I either perceive *less* colorations in the SET amp or am not as sensitive to colorations in the SET amp. I would like to think the prior case is the actual case, but I won't lose any sleep if it is the latter case.
"Accuracy is not a subjective evaluation"
It should not be, but I say it **is**... People tend to assign components with an "analytical" character as "accurate." (Or the pre-conceived notion that "accurate" *has* to be analytical in sonic character.) The problem is whenever a component is deemed to be "accurate," how do we really know it is truly the case? Great specs, possibly, but IMO established specifications have little correlation to real-world performance.
What is "accurate" to one person may be "sonically colored" to another. It all comes down the the adage, "Pick your poison."
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- I Don't... - Todd Krieger 12:31:02 07/22/03 (5)
- Re: I Don't... - Don T 16:49:58 07/22/03 (4)
- Re: I Don't... - Todd Krieger 00:29:43 07/23/03 (3)
- Re: I Don't... - Don T 10:05:16 07/23/03 (2)
- Man, This Thread Would Have Been Great in "Propeller Head"... - Todd Krieger 13:22:18 07/23/03 (1)
- Well then.... - Don T 22:23:57 07/23/03 (0)