Are shielded cables declasse?

Ever since my dad put together a hifi system--one of the first, back in the late 1940's--I have always taken it for granted that shielded cable must be used for interconnects. That's what he used between the Pilotuner and the David Bogen DB10 amp; and from the record changer to the little RCA preamp; and from the preamp to the Bogen. It didn't even have an insulating jacket. The shield was right on top.

Oh, I knew that you could use a twisted pair--but if your stereo was any good, you wanted shielded cable.

For years, I have made my own interconnects. What's wrong with RG-59 terminated with pretty gold-plated RCAs with fancy coil-spring strain reliefs? Well, I've tried microphone cable too. And not forgetting the Canare cable I eventually swithed to. But now, all this is apparently anathema . . .

In reading, recently, I have gottten the impression that shielded cable is passe. Old fashioned. Sonically inferior. Now, we must have tri-braided cable, or something woven by a zen master--and definitely NOT shielded.

IS there anything to this? I have a pair of half-meter Kimber PBJs. They run from the CD player to the preamp. Good, but I'm not sure I hear the difference between them and my DIY microphone cable interconnects. Or is the Monster cable (shielded) between the preamp and power amp obscuring the subtle superiority of the Kimber?

Is shielding a No-no?

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:

Topic - Are shielded cables declasse? - robfoto@sbcglobal.net 21:50:32 05/30/08 (29)

RE: Are shielded cables declasse? - Sunya 02:20:40 06/02/08 (1)

Vovox - laznos 19:42:20 06/05/08 (0)

RE: Are shielded cables declasse? - zanash 23:09:21 06/01/08 (1)

RE: Are shielded cables declasse? - Ted Smith 23:36:59 06/01/08 (0)

RE: Are shielded cables declasse? - BS64 14:14:26 06/01/08 (4)

I think I see what you mean, but . . . - robfoto@sbcglobal.net 22:02:39 06/05/08 (3)

I agree w/lancelot - BS64 04:50:41 06/09/08 (0)

RE: I think I see what you mean, but . . . - lancelot 19:25:16 06/06/08 (1)

I'm hearing a lot to like - robfoto@sbcglobal.net 16:55:21 06/09/08 (0)

RE: Are shielded cables declasse? - Jim in Blacksburg 17:23:25 05/31/08 (0)

Only for lower-resolution systems. - Al Sekela 10:34:35 05/31/08 (16)

I too disagree... - Cpk 06:58:54 06/01/08 (0)

Hmmm, since you implicitly called my system a lower resolution system :) - Ted Smith 13:19:09 05/31/08 (14)

The distinction is between RF noise and audio band noise. - Al Sekela 14:44:03 06/01/08 (13)

RE: The distinction is between RF noise and audio band noise. - Ted Smith 20:14:00 06/01/08 (12)

No, you read me correctly the first time. - Al Sekela 21:35:33 06/01/08 (11)

OK, so how do you damp a shield? - robfoto@sbcglobal.net 21:46:38 06/05/08 (4)

You extract energy from the electric or magnetic fields. - Al Sekela 08:38:51 06/06/08 (3)

Carbon? - robfoto@sbcglobal.net 18:05:26 06/11/08 (1)

RE: Carbon? - Ted Smith 18:46:38 06/11/08 (0)

Tease! :-)) nt - andyr 03:04:12 06/07/08 (0)

Also... - E-Stat 10:07:15 06/03/08 (1)

Exactly. - Al Sekela 13:28:47 06/03/08 (0)

:) - Ted Smith 22:47:22 06/01/08 (3)

Properly-built shielded cables for audio - Al Sekela 09:21:10 06/02/08 (2)

RE: Properly-built shielded cables for audio - Ted Smith 09:36:23 06/02/08 (1)

No, sorry. (nt) - Al Sekela 13:57:24 06/05/08 (0)

RE: Are shielded cables declasse? - Ted Smith 10:24:49 05/31/08 (0)

RE: Are shielded cables declasse? - Awe-d-o-file 22:30:19 05/30/08 (0)

Are shielded cables declasse?

Post a Message!