HTTP/1.0 200 OK Content-type: text/html
Can't connect to database, trying again....HTTP/1.0 200 OK Content-type: text/html
Can't connect to database, trying again....
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
66.57.21.92
In Reply to: Simple.. posted by Frank.. on November 08, 2004 at 02:21:21:
"Just ask the stores sales person to show the discs contents. If it's hires there is a logo 'adavanced resolution' or DVD Audio on the cover or in the inlay booklet."
Follow Ups:
Simple Plan's 16 bit 88.2ks is not 'advanced resolution'. Perhaps that's why there are no hires logo's on the cover.Now for the simple part.
If it doesn't show a logo then don't buy.Some of the disc produced for the test early this year had logo's to indicate hires content.
If that's the case, all of the 24/48 DVD-As/DualDiscs definitely aren't.
A doubling of the sample rate doubles the frequency range.
.
F
I was pointing out the error in your assertion, but as usual it went right over your head.
No, 24 Bit 48kHz is low resolution, you have less ambiance and a MUCH courser sound at 48kHz than you do a 96kHz. And the smoothest most relaxed sound of all is at 192kHz. Sampling frequency is just as important as bit depth. All you have to do is listen to the difference between the three.Resolution is in the bits and the Sampling Frequency. The minimum for high resolution is 88.2kHz 24 Bit, anything lower is too compromised.
"A doubling of the sample rate doubles the frequency range.
Only half correct it also doubles the amount of samples per second, twice as many samples per second equals twice the resolution.
*** Simple Plan's 16 bit 88.2ks is not 'advanced resolution'. ***If you look at Warner's "Missy Elliot: miss E ... so addictive", the back cover says "Advanced Resolution Stereo" in addition to Advanced Resolution surround and Dolby Digital.
The "Advanced Resolution Stereo" is a 44.1kHz 16bit track.
So if 44.1/16 qualifies as "advanced resolution stereo" then i would suggest so does 88.2/16.
F.
check out the disc specs yourself (after all, you claimed that you own "nearly all" the warner titles, so you must have this in your collection).
So I must be smarter. :)If this disc release is youre 'proof' to you I fear the worst.
.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: