|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
203.45.118.47
In Reply to: you mean SACD stands (well, not really :-) as the neanderthal on the audio hirez evolutionary scale? posted by NonA on October 25, 2004 at 13:05:09:
... so perhaps you have the direction of the evolutionary scale wrong? if so, that is highly amusing, Alicia!
Follow Ups:
As we move through analog stages, eventually regressing towards 'rock' ie solid minerals.I'm surprised no one mentioned that 'Critics' are at the beginning of the evolutionary ladder, which makes perfect sense to me :)
Cheers
Eric"Julian Dicks is everywhere.
It's like they've got eleven Dicks on the
field."
if you look at the three rows, they kind of divide into:Top Row: the fundamental, really important stuff, like amps, speakers, vinyl :-)
Middle Row: the "B" team, including all digital, tape, tuners, etc.
Bottom Row: the "ghetto" including film, video, water coolers, inmate systems ...and they roughly map in terms of "importance" reading from top to bottom, left to right ...
digital is classified as more important than hi-rez, which makes sense since "digital" is generic and potential includes new, higher rez formats than either SACD or DVD-A
...then I would think music (all forms) would have to be at the top :-).
.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: