|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
In Reply to: Why not choose a universal so you can enjoy SACD as well and of which there are about 3x as many titles nt posted by javajive on April 16, 2004 at 17:22:30:
Heard SACD in a couple of demos at a local tweeter store and was not impressed. then heard DVD-A and thought the sound was fuller and more richer especially over redbook CD's. Thats why I'm leaning towards DVD-A and for just $99 I just might take the leap, even if the format doesn't survive it won't be a big investment wasted. Plus you can always use it as a video source. Sounds like a win/win situation.
Follow Ups:
As a universal player owner the "which is better" is a non issue.
They don't have a sound room that I know of. Hard to compare since you almost cetainly head different discs, unless it was "Gaucho", "Solar Energy", or "Up" (couple others),I AM NOT saying you are wrong. DVD-A has a very nice sound; I am listening to Ravel's Espagnole on DVDA right now, as a matter of fact. But you might want a better test to se if there is a difference between the two for you; and if the difference is so big that you want to do without SACD capability.
Can I offer a suggestion for the test disc?
Before, you write off SACD, listen IN MULTICHANNEL to "DSOTM". Especially the dynamic range. I don't believe I have ever heard that dynamic range on a CD.
No it was in the high end soundroom. I believe the disc was a sony SACD sampler, mostly jazz. The player was a Sony with Adcom equipment and heard also with B&K equipment. Not saying the sound was bad just thought it would have sounded better. While in their HT room I heard DVD-A with a pioneer player and Denon equipment, and thought the sound was much better then CD although it was in MC. Anyway I'm going today to buy the Panasonic!
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: