|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
At least according to this HFR article. Until you realize that the writer is actually a member of the DVD-Audio Marketing Council...
-wolf
Follow Ups:
just from looking at the stalled list of new releases...
Flaming Lips and REM are the only reason I got into DVD-A.
I was under the impression that not all dvd players played dvd audio. Or is it more a question of play v. play at high-resolution?
All DVDA discs can be played on all DVD players. The high resolution portion of DVDA discs can only be played on players that are DVDA capabale.
mt
You'd think I'd be "capable" of using my spulcheker! :)
As much as I love to see another Widespread Panic release on DVD-A, the fact that it's on Silverline (and will likely not have a 2-channel mix) makes it completely and utterly useless to me.
Anyone wanna bet that at least half, if not most of the major labor rock stuff (Jackson Browne, Cars, The Who, etc.) never see's the light of day. Come on folks, the Jackson Browne titles were first announced for a October 2002, yes, 2002 release! Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me! I was an early fan and adoptee of DVD-A but I think they've drag their new release butt along too slowly of late and have let SACD take away their multi-channel thunder. Early on DVD-A was the 5.1 king with great multi-channel releases from the likes of The Eagles, Queen, Fleetwood Mac, and Deep Purple. The last few multi-channel disc I've picked up have been SACD releases by Pink Floyd, Dave Bowie, The Who, and Bob Dylan. I can't see how the recent sale and restructioning of the Warner Music division is going to do a lot to help their position on DVD-A. In my life the glass is normally half empty. However, when it comes to DVD-A I think the glass has been dropped and cracked into little pieces.
.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: