|
Tubes Asylum Questions about tubes and gear that glows. FAQ |
|
|
|
Tubes Asylum Questions about tubes and gear that glows. FAQ |
|
I read somewhere ( possibly this forum ) that 6cg7/6fq7's could be replaced with 6dj8's, although none of the tube substitution books or web sites mention this.
Sooo, I replaced a pair of noisey 6cg7 driver's in my trusty, rusty Moscode 300 with some nice old Tungsram 6dj8's I had knockin' around in the tube shoebox. They seem to be working, much quieter. But am I doing harm to the Moscode?
What differentiates the 6cg7 from the 6dj8?
Thanks in advance.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - 6cg7/6fq7 substitution? Are 6dj8's ok? - LesF 01:04:44 04/15/01 (9)
- Re: 6cg7/6fq7 substitution? Are 6dj8's ok? - Thilo.C 12:23:29 04/19/01 (0)
- I would go here and. . - John PA 10:37:05 04/15/01 (2)
- Thanks John PA. Great site! - LesF 11:52:11 04/15/01 (1)
- The basic tube layout is like this. . - John PA 12:26:47 04/15/01 (0)
- Re: 6cg7/6fq7 substitution? Are 6dj8's ok *****NO!!! - DCK 03:43:40 04/15/01 (4)
- Re: 6cg7/6fq7 substitution? Are 6dj8's ok, Maybe!!! - Jeff Starr 10:10:54 04/15/01 (0)
- Re: 6cg7/6fq7 substitution? Are 6dj8's ok *****NO!!! - andy evans 07:59:18 04/15/01 (2)
- Re: 6cg7/6fq7 substitution? Are 6dj8's ok *****NO!!! - Jim McShane 12:48:19 04/15/01 (1)
- Re: 6cg7/6fq7 substitution? Are 6dj8's ok *****NO!!! - andy evans 16:14:39 04/15/01 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2025, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
