In Reply to: It's what USA's audiences let FM become, made worse, and no longer free. posted by Timbo in Oz on August 1, 2006 at 07:00:25:
Timbo,
This is a forum about radio. We call it Radio Road, not Tuner Tunnel, or FM Farm. And yes, internet radio applies.Blaming US audiences for the problem will only get you so far. It's a chicken and egg thing. Did internet kill good radio, or did bad radio drive people to the internet? Its like asking "Did Rupert Murdoch destroy good newspapers, or did bad newspaper standards enable tabloids to replace good newspapers?" I'm lucky to live near Boston where the commercial-free college stations can pick up the slack. And near New York, where the Times is still worth reading.
Internet radio and satellite radio stations appeal is all about programming. The sound quality is really crap. We all know that. That said, I can listen to radio from around the world via the web. So thank you so much for personally saving Australian radio than the rest of the unworthy world can enjoy it too, albeit via that nasty computer that I spend most of my working life in front of.
"well, bugger me!"
No thank you. But thank you so much for Rupert Murdoch. That's similar, isn't it?Love and kisses,
Gregg
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Beg to differ - Gregg 10:55:55 08/01/06 (8)
- I beg to differ. - sgmlaw 17:43:49 08/01/06 (7)
- Re: I beg to lighten up the posts here.......... - Jimmy 07:46:02 08/02/06 (6)
- Re: I beg to lighten up the posts here.......... - Jon C. 18:54:45 08/02/06 (5)
- 'will they ever value better fidelity' - Jimmy 10:25:32 08/03/06 (0)
- That is you Jon, - Jimmy 19:42:01 08/02/06 (3)
- Re: That is you Jon, - Jon C. 04:48:05 08/03/06 (2)
- Need to chime in - Gregg 06:27:50 08/03/06 (1)
- t's all about convenience and marketability....analogue FM can't compete against that...nt - millen 09:51:08 08/03/06 (0)