In Reply to: RE: Cathodyne VS LTP posted by PakProtector on May 1, 2021 at 05:09:58:
Thanks Douglas, I'll look for those. It's becoming evident from additional SPICE work and calculations that I'll be short of gain in this design (EF86 - 6C4 cathodyne - 5881 push-pull). Even with the EF86 operating at highest gain, 20 dB of feedback will create a slight shortfall.
The chassis is already cut for a 7-pin in the splitter position, so the choices are limited. The easiest option would be to incorporate positive feedback from the 6C4 back to the EF86, similar to the RCA 30W design. I believe this technique will approximately double the total driver gain. The other possibility is to replace the cathodyne with a 6J6 LTP like I mentioned. That would provide better than a X10 increase. SPICE is telling me the 6J6 is a cleaner approach, but I'm not convinced yet. It would be great if I could find an example of this somewhere. Thanks again for your suggestion!
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Cathodyne VS LTP - Triode_Kingdom 06:46:04 05/01/21 (14)
- RE: Cathodyne VS LTP - kyle 09:46:43 05/03/21 (5)
- Thanks, I'll keep it in mind! (nt) - Triode_Kingdom 12:41:06 05/03/21 (4)
- Increasing Gain in Respectable Transconductance 7 Pin Mini Types - Eli Duttman 02:12:57 05/04/21 (3)
- Distortion RE: Increasing Gain in Respectable Transconductance 7 Pin Mini Types - Paul Joppa 07:47:35 05/04/21 (1)
- HK Ratings - Triode_Kingdom 08:43:25 05/04/21 (0)
- RE: Increasing Gain in Respectable Transconductance 7 Pin Mini Types - PakProtector 03:13:43 05/04/21 (0)
- RE: Cathodyne VS LTP - Eli Duttman 16:28:47 05/01/21 (7)
- RE: Cathodyne VS LTP - Triode_Kingdom 20:22:10 05/01/21 (6)
- RE: Cathodyne VS LTP - rage 11:52:04 05/05/21 (2)
- Choke in the Tail - Triode_Kingdom 23:35:44 05/05/21 (1)
- RE: Choke in the Tail - rage 06:55:38 05/06/21 (0)
- Decision - Triode_Kingdom 23:51:27 05/01/21 (0)
- RE: Cathodyne VS LTP - Eli Duttman 23:35:54 05/01/21 (1)
- RE: Cathodyne VS LTP - PakProtector 05:47:03 05/03/21 (0)