In Reply to: Re: Updating & Refining the " DCR " Topic posted by Larry D. Moore on March 9, 2007 at 04:59:10:
Let me defend myself.1) I want to understand the reasons for what I am doing. Simply stating 'it sounds better' doesn't hack it. Why does is sound better?
2) 'Sounding better' is a pretty illdefined term. What the heck do terms like 'faster' and 'slugish' and 'mushy' really mean? And to whom does it sound better? I have been using a NAD non tube based preamp for many years. I tried to replace it with a tube preamp, which to me sounded 'better'. But you know what? My wife didn't like it. Without some kind of verifiable criteria, sounding 'better' is purely a matter of individual taste.
So forgive me for my skepticism and for my reliance on simulations and theory.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Being one of those 'hard nosed' non belivers ... - mikeyb 08:33:38 03/09/07 (11)
- Re: "My wife didn't like it." - Ivan303 12:29:37 03/09/07 (0)
- Re: Being one of those 'hard nosed' non belivers ... - rdf 10:16:48 03/09/07 (9)
- Re: Being one of those 'hard nosed' non belivers ... - Tre' 08:11:12 03/10/07 (8)
- Re: Being one of those 'hard nosed' non belivers ... - rdf 08:58:33 03/10/07 (6)
- Re: Being one of those 'hard nosed' non belivers ... - Tre' 14:31:15 03/10/07 (2)
- Re: Being one of those 'hard nosed' non belivers ... - rdf 17:18:05 03/10/07 (0)
- Re: Being one of those 'hard nosed' non belivers ... - Dave Cigna 15:26:12 03/10/07 (0)
- Re: Being one of those 'hard nosed' non belivers ... - drlowmu 14:14:26 03/10/07 (2)
- Re: Being one of those 'hard nosed' non belivers ... - rdf 17:42:18 03/10/07 (1)
- Re: Being one of those 'hard nosed' non belivers ... - drlowmu 18:42:16 03/10/07 (0)
- Right you are Tre' ... - drlowmu 08:26:18 03/10/07 (0)