Room Acoustics Forum by Rives Audio Welcome! Need support, you got it. Or share you ideas and experiences. |
|
In Reply to: RE: QRD placement, grouping and orientation posted by David Aiken on February 10, 2011 at 12:48:31:
Thanks David,
Great analogy, in fact that is exactly how I cook !
That makes perfect sense, As I intent to keep the panels portable, I will experiment to see which gives me the sound I like (I tend to prefer good imaging).
What are your thoughts on grouping QRDs ?
From what I have read and tried to understand, QRDs work better when grouped together in four or more (using a Barker code for more than 4) which would suggest that because of my limited space, I would get better results from grouping four 18 inch QRDs together rather than three 24 inch. My only concern being I would lose some lower end diffusion.
Really appreciate your input, I live for sound and music.
Mark
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: QRD placement, grouping and orientation - Mark UK 15:23:57 02/10/11 (8)
- Some quick thoughts on reflection… - David Aiken 23:38:43 02/11/11 (5)
- RE: Some quick thoughts on reflection… - Mark UK 14:36:59 02/13/11 (4)
- "… 4 ft wide absorption immediately behind the listening position which opens out into a biggish room behind…" - David Aiken 23:04:07 02/13/11 (3)
- RE: "… 4 ft wide absorption immediately behind the listening position which opens out into a biggish room behind…" - Mark UK 01:16:10 02/14/11 (2)
- 'suck it and see' - David Aiken 13:09:49 02/14/11 (1)
- RE: 'suck it and see' - Mark UK 03:55:55 02/17/11 (0)
- RE: QRD placement, grouping and orientation - David Aiken 00:10:05 02/11/11 (1)
- RE: QRD placement, grouping and orientation - Mark UK 03:48:10 02/11/11 (0)