In Reply to: Re: I think we agreed more than you think posted by Soundmind on August 26, 2004 at 12:44:00:
You rejected my attempt to establish any sort of weighting scheme (which is essential if you are going to provide any sort of overall comparative rating for a cable, IMO). OK, it wasn't my idea so I'm fine with dunping it, BUT.....Does this mean that you are saying all cables are equally bad UNLESS their measurable deviations from perfect are all below the threshold of audibility, in which case they are all equally good?
Isn't that what this means:
"Are you trying to place relative values on these different kinds of distortion and equate one degree of badness in one with another degree of badness in another? Aren't these apples and oranges? If you can hear them, aren't both objectionable? If you can't, at least by my reckoning, it wouldn't matter?"
I'm trying hard to understand your POV. Am I getting there?Peter
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Ok, I've read this post a bunch of times.... - Commuteman 22:22:04 09/01/04 (0)