|
Propeller Head Plaza Technical and scientific discussion of amps, cables and other topics. |
Register / Login
|
|
|
Propeller Head Plaza Technical and scientific discussion of amps, cables and other topics. |
Register / Login
|
In Reply to: I'd call it a compound dipole -- advantages the same as all dipoles (reduced excitation of some room modes) posted by Richard BassNut Greene on October 31, 2006 at 09:21:31:
I see no compelling reason to use either. Free space analysis of the Quadrupole and my correspondence with SL reinforces this impression.
Perhaps Clayton Shaws data on in room performance may reveal something interesting. Perhaps not. We'll see.cheers,
AJ
http://www.kettering.edu/~drussell/Publications/MDQSources.pdf
http://www.linkwitzlab.com/models.htm#B1
The threshold for disproving something is higher than the threshold for saying it, which is a recipe for the accumulation of bullshit - Softky
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Compound dipole +- +- Quadrupole +- -+ - AJinFLA 15:54:35 10/31/06 (4)
- Actually a compound configuration can be either +- +- or +- -+ - Richard BassNut Greene 07:37:24 11/03/06 (0)
- Then A Quadrupole Is Basically An OB Bipolar Design - thetubeguy1954 05:55:23 11/01/06 (2)
- With an open baffle, it's definitely not a bipole design - Richard BassNut Greene 08:53:40 11/01/06 (1)
- Re: With an open baffle, it's definitely not a bipole design - thetubeguy1954 09:30:03 11/01/06 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2025, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
