In Reply to: Re: For The Record.... posted by kerr on October 28, 2006 at 17:50:46:
> Unfortunately, it's likely that I'll never know when and if my audiophile
> beliefs are dropped since I've never seen that term defined.Now, now, this is not true and you know it.
>> if we consider Peter Aczels 10 lies,...
There are 10 audiophile beliefs explained in a couple of pages.
> ...but the mere fact that he (and you) use the term "lie" to denote the
> idea that personal preference exist (i.e tubes and vinyl), well...Now, now, this is not true and you know it. Nobody has questioned your preferences nor have they questioned your experiences just your incorrect projection of those experineces onto the hardware.
> it's just very hard to take him seriously.
Why do you need to take him seriously? Surely all that matters is the arguments he puts forward.
> It would make as much sense for you to call Anti-Digital Teresa a liar
> because she prefers the color red to blue.Again you are pretending to confuse preference with what is established scientifically. Why are you this desperate?
> I do thank you for the tips on further research and I intend to continue my
> exploration.Perhaps we could add to the list your examining why you are sinking to this level of hopeless argument to support the audiophile cause. Could it be that this is the best argument that can be put forward? Have you ever seen a better argument? Is it because I have a brain the size of a planet? Or, perhaps, because everything hangs together and it is easy for anyone to put the scientific case for that which lies in the scientific domain?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: For The Record.... - andy19191 00:51:24 10/30/06 (2)
- Re: For The Record.... - kerr 09:42:22 11/02/06 (1)
- Re: For The Record.... - andy19191 13:11:45 11/02/06 (0)