|
Propeller Head Plaza Technical and scientific discussion of amps, cables and other topics. |
Register / Login
|
|
|
Propeller Head Plaza Technical and scientific discussion of amps, cables and other topics. |
Register / Login
|
In Reply to: Every time you open your mouth, you just stick both of your feet in it deeper and deeper posted by Soundmind on October 25, 2006 at 07:08:26:
Soundmind, I cannot let you get away with this mindless chastising of something that I responded to.
IF you originally said that frequency and time are really the same thing, except seen from a different perspective, then I would agree to that. BUT, you cannot then say if you know the -1dB or -3 dB response of a network, that you can predict the risetime and transient response from that number ONLY! You can't, unless you know the ENTIRE response of the network and its phase shift with frequency.
Once again, for everyone else, it is easier to have an extended bandwidth with a gradual (-6dB to -12dB per octave) rolloff, than a bandwidth extending just beyond 20KHz and very steep in its rolloff, to have an almost ideal risetime and nearly ideal transient response without pre-shoot or ringing.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Every time you open your mouth, you just stick both of your feet in it deeper and deeper - john curl 08:15:08 10/25/06 (24)
- You just don't get it. The time for the technical discussion of this topic ended three and a half weeks ago - Soundmind 08:26:57 10/25/06 (23)
- Re: You just don't get it. The time for the technical discussion of this topic ended three and a half weeks ago - john curl 11:49:57 10/25/06 (22)
- You can't change history that easily, silly. - jneutron 09:50:59 10/26/06 (0)
- John, John - E-Stat 08:49:08 10/26/06 (16)
- Re: John, John - john curl 10:01:53 10/26/06 (0)
- "We should rejoice in this continuing source of levity." There ya go! nt - clarkjohnsen 09:00:42 10/26/06 (14)
- I know I can, just by re-reading John Curl's "serious discussion" with May Belt about cables - Soundmind 14:25:54 10/26/06 (13)
- No surprise here - E-Stat 05:43:43 10/27/06 (10)
- You would be best off..... - Soundmind 06:11:01 10/27/06 (9)
- Why certainly - E-Stat 06:31:04 10/27/06 (8)
- Re: Why certainly - Soundmind 06:48:35 10/27/06 (7)
- R-E-A-D---M-O-R-E---S-L-O-W-L-Y - E-Stat 06:59:23 10/27/06 (6)
- T-H-I-N-K---M-O-R-E---C-L-E-A-R-L-Y - Soundmind 07:12:42 10/27/06 (5)
- Still missing the point - E-Stat 07:52:56 10/27/06 (4)
- You're wrong as usual - Soundmind 08:36:01 10/27/06 (3)
- Exactly - E-Stat 09:01:24 10/27/06 (2)
- Re: Exactly - Soundmind 09:12:57 10/27/06 (1)
- Gotcha. Have no idea as to the meaning of "qualitative" (nt) - E-Stat 09:24:23 10/27/06 (0)
- Re: I know I can, just by re-reading John Curl's "serious discussion" with May Belt about cables - john curl 21:35:32 10/26/06 (1)
- Re: I know I can, just by re-reading John Curl's "serious discussion" with May Belt about cables - Soundmind 05:22:06 10/27/06 (0)
- Normally I'd ignore your obsessive focus on this topic but I have a question for you - Soundmind 12:36:06 10/25/06 (3)
- Re: Normally I'd ignore your obsessive focus on this topic but I have a question for you - john curl 14:35:11 10/25/06 (2)
- Re: Normally I'd ignore your obsessive focus on this topic but I have a question for you - Soundmind 07:26:27 10/26/06 (0)
- Re: Normally I'd ignore your obsessive focus on this topic but I have a question for you - john curl 15:46:13 10/25/06 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2025, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
