![]() |
Propeller Head Plaza Technical and scientific discussion of amps, cables and other topics. |
Register / Login
|
In Reply to: I'm not interested in a DBT........... posted by Dan Banquer on June 26, 2006 at 16:19:23:
More Objectivist BS. Although I've told you many times in the past I'm NOT technically inclined you are attempting to bully me with technical information you require i.e. "...I am interested in you putting up the engineering spec's that you require for what you think is a good system." You always do this when confronted by less technically inclined persons. You are only proving your the Bully I've accused you of being in the past!My system is so much better than just a good system. It consists of a Mastersound Reference 845, integrated SET. The source is a BlueNote Stibbert CDP. The speakers use my Aliante Pinafarina Ones for lows and partial midrange, and this crosses over to very large wooden horns using pre-1990 TAD 2001 compression drivers that have been fully restored & modified by Paul Butterfield (who also restored and modded TADs for Nelson Pass, Tom Danley & Dr Bruce Edgar to name just a few) to cover the reamining spectrum of music.
But I digress because as in typical Objectivist fashion you are trying to change the original topic once caught in your lie, the lie being your statement of "These guys tend to be very vocal in the criticisms, but do a disappearing act when it comes to something verifiable, & repeatable." (This can be verified by clicking on the link below) To your lie I answered:
"...I am one of THESE GUYS who tends to be very vocal in my criticisms, I do NOT do a disappearing act when it comes to something verifiable, & repeatable. I just cannot get one of YOU GUYS to take me up on my offer to provide the proof you require, yet definitely don't want to believe can be provided!"
Now you claim you don't want something verifiable, & repeatable. Now in a rather in a pathetic attempt to appear correct after being caught in your lie you are now claiming you are "...interested in (my) putting up the engineering spec's that (I) require for what (I) think is a good system."
This has NOTHING to do with what you originally said. Please explain how my putting up the engineering spec's that (I) require for what (I) think is a good system, has ANYTHING to do with your original statement of: These guys tend to be very vocal in the criticisms, but do a disappearing act when it comes to something verifiable, & repeatable?
The ONLY thing your new statement about engineering spec's does is represents nicely the typical Objectivist behavior of always needing to be right, even if it means discarding your original statement completely and changing the topic in order to do so.
You are so pathetic Dan, you cannot stick to your original statement when someone accepts the challenge you claim makes people like me run! We need to add a new topic to Debunking Tools. I think we should call this new debunking tool, "The Banquer" The Banquer is when the poster changes the topic of thier original post to a completely different subject for ANY reason! Or as Dan did to: a) ignore the acceptance of his implied challenge or b) just to appear correct.
You told me to put up or shut up Dan, but I'd tell you to be ready to defend your beliefs as originally stated or don't put them in print where you lies and deceptive tactics can be so easily verified. Because when I did "put up" and accept your implied challenge the only one who ran WAS YOU!
Thetubeguy1954
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: I'm not interested in a DBT........... - thetubeguy1954 06:08:38 06/28/06 (2)
- Re: I'm not interested in a DBT........... - Dan Banquer 09:21:04 06/28/06 (1)
- Stick With Your ORIGINAL Topic & Stop Running - thetubeguy1954 10:20:55 06/29/06 (0)