Home Propeller Head Plaza

Technical and scientific discussion of amps, cables and other topics.

Re: Can't be any good, Tom, it used blind testing!

Pat D, As I've stated to you many times in the past A) I'm against DBT's and B) I keep an open mind. As I stated I thought the thesis was a very good read, even though the author used DBT's.

His conclusions made a lot of sense to me. As I've also stated before I want to enjoy my hobby. I don't want to obtain a BS in order to enjoy it.

If after reading it you feel "...So what's new?" due to either your extensive knowledge about psychoacoustics, circuitry design & distortion measurements etc. or your arrogance, so be it. This article was new to me and I throughly enjoyed reading it. I thought perhaps some others here might like to read it if they already haven't.

This type of response of yours and it tone, once again illustrates your general negativity, and it's THAT trait of yours and not our personal differences in audio beliefs that usually cause our posts to decline to the level they do.

Think about it, all I did was say it was a good read and you felt the need make more negative comments directed towards me i.e. "Can't be any good, Tom, it used blind testing!" even after I said it WAS a good read.

Your actions speak volumes about yourself. Try lightening up Pat, it's better for your health.

Thetubeguy1954


This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
  Kimber Kable  


Follow Ups Full Thread
Follow Ups


You can not post to an archived thread.