Re: Hmmm... - thetubeguy1954 - Propeller Head Plaza

Re: Hmmm...

Posted by thetubeguy1954 (A) on June 5, 2006 at 06:05:12

In Reply to: Hmmm... posted by real_jj on June 2, 2006 at 13:58:46:

Real JJ, I have no problems admitting when I don't understand something so I appreciate your "dumbing down" the response so I could understand it better.

I certainly don't want to remain ignorant on this topic, nor do I wish to have to obtain a degree to understand it, either!

When you say" "Ok, the amount of information available at the loudness memory stage is a swimming pool full.

The feature extraction pulls some semi-conciously, semi-unconciously selected bits out of the swimming pool, analyzes it, and gives you a quart jar full of information.

The auditory object phase analyzes the quart of water, and comes up with a few drops of water that describes what you heard.

What I (Thetubeguy1954) hear is, we have a swimming pool of data, the feature extraction gives one a quart jar full of information and the auditory object phase analyzes THAT quart and comes up with a few drops of water that describes what was heard.

I'm sorry Real JJ, I don't wish to incur your wrath, especially after you've taken so much time to try and explain your point-of-view, but I just cannot believe, that four unique individuals would be doing the exact same things in regards to overdetection, inadvertant self-influence, etc, so that they all would end up with the same few drops of water (out of a swimming pool full) that describes what was heard. That seems extremely improbabile to me!

At this point I'll post less and read more, but doubt I'll be changing my mind anytime soon.

Thanks, Thetubeguy1954

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Let Me Ask A Question.... - thetubeguy1954 14:04:25 06/01/06 (24)

Re: Let Me Ask A Question.... - okiemax 20:16:10 06/01/06 (6)

Re: Let Me Ask A Question.... - okiemax 07:20:32 06/02/06 (1)

The above was intended for tubeguy (nt) - okiemax 07:30:13 06/02/06 (0)

Re: Let Me Ask A Question.... - thetubeguy1954 05:55:45 06/02/06 (1)

Replied in wrong place - okiemax 07:25:31 06/02/06 (0)

" I listen to determine if I like it better than what it would be replacing." - Robert Hamel 21:36:44 06/01/06 (1)

Re: " I listen to determine if I like it better than what it would be replacing." - okiemax 23:39:05 06/01/06 (0)

Because the whole problem is probabilistic... - real_jj 14:36:12 06/01/06 (13)

Re: Because the whole problem is probabilistic... - thetubeguy1954 06:28:37 06/02/06 (10)

Etc... - real_jj 11:36:17 06/02/06 (4)

Re: Etc... - thetubeguy1954 13:35:57 06/02/06 (3)

Hmmm... - real_jj 13:58:46 06/02/06 (2)

Re: Hmmm... - thetubeguy1954 06:05:12 06/05/06 (1)

Well, all it takes is... - real_jj 11:41:33 06/05/06 (0)

That's a list of questions. I'll have to address them 1 at a time. - real_jj 10:00:44 06/02/06 (1)

Re: That's a list of questions. I'll have to address them 1 at a time. - thetubeguy1954 10:10:49 06/02/06 (0)

The "probabilistic" argument can be circumvented. - clarkjohnsen 07:48:24 06/02/06 (2)

That's exactly what blind tests do, Clark, and you know it. - real_jj 10:01:30 06/02/06 (1)

"jj always knows better"! Now, about the tubeguy's question... nt - clarkjohnsen 11:31:54 06/02/06 (0)

A question - Robert Hamel 15:55:55 06/01/06 (1)

That's a good question. - real_jj 16:16:11 06/01/06 (1)

Please don't feed the animals....(nt) - mkuller 14:31:16 06/01/06 (2)

Why are you trying to intrude into a real discussion? - real_jj 14:36:48 06/01/06 (1)

Re: Why are you trying to intrude into a real discussion? - Dan Banquer 15:36:13 06/01/06 (0)

Follow Ups

Re: Hmmm... - thetubeguy1954 06:05:12 06/05/06 (1)

Well, all it takes is... - real_jj 11:41:33 06/05/06 (0)

You can not post to an archived thread.