In Reply to: I think that's what clinical psychologists are paid to do, devise tests of this type posted by Soundmind on June 1, 2006 at 14:25:24:
Your example establishes the mean and variance of human visual accuity under specific illumination conditions. If you were going to use that information to help design a DBT comparing, say, two different digital cameras, how would you proceed? What would be an analogue for two amplifiers?*
"Oklahoma is the Cultural Center of the Universe." - Hoyt Axton
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- I agree that such data exists or can be established, but that is one of several required steps. - rditmars 14:37:16 06/01/06 (10)
- Re: I agree that such data exists or can be established, but that is one of several required steps. - Soundmind 15:06:10 06/01/06 (8)
- We agree (I think) that DBTs for audio equip. while not impossible, are impractical. (nt) - rditmars 15:16:13 06/01/06 (7)
- Acoustic Research used to demo its equipment against live musicians...quite convincingly too nt - Soundmind 15:23:05 06/01/06 (6)
- Re: So did Memorex - geoffkait 04:14:06 06/02/06 (5)
- Re: So does Gilmore Speakers - thetubeguy1954 13:54:55 06/02/06 (0)
- The AR demos had their little tricks. Did you know that Tom Edison began that practice? - clarkjohnsen 07:36:03 06/02/06 (3)
- Re: The AR demos had their little tricks. Did you know that Tom Edison began that practice? - thetubeguy1954 13:56:40 06/02/06 (2)
- It wasn't cylinders, rather Diamond Discs, and (par for the course) the poster below has it all wrong. - clarkjohnsen 08:12:21 06/03/06 (0)
- Their trick was they tried to build speakers that sounded like musical instruments... - Soundmind 14:50:02 06/02/06 (0)
- You can find ultimate sensitivities for human listeners in Fletcher - real_jj 14:39:29 06/01/06 (0)