Home Propeller Head Plaza

Technical and scientific discussion of amps, cables and other topics.

Why should we be bothered by so called "science".

Hi.

If one wants to endorse the textbooks dated back to 1800s without questioning their validity as of todate, go ahead. But why force others to adopt them?

I am not religious (sorry, despite my whole family is & I married my wife in her chapel), & I would not & I do not HAVE TO believe any word said in the bibles. Why? 'cause they were all written by men, not the Almighty. All human are infallibale. That simple.

Science is defined as "study concerned a body of observed material facts". It's an on-going process. Nothing can be considered as final.

Take an example, I take OHm's Laws conditional.

Now objectivity study of aural perception, using the tools of DBTs, etc etc, is some methodolgies to carry out to understandof our aural nature.

Being man-made, these tools need futher refinement to achieve the ultimate goal of understanding the natural sciecne of our aural percpetion. These tools are not yet there.

The textbooks said "burden of proof" is vested on whoever who claims
under psychological influence. The question is: who does NOT??? We are all human, who always act on psychological influence. Period.

The textbooks said whoever act under pyschological influence
"are guilty until proven innocent". This I never buy!!!!!

The laws, made by man, endorse the universal logics of "innocent until proven guilty".

Why so different role taken by those outdated textbooks ???????

c-J




This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
  Sonic Craft  


Follow Ups Full Thread
Follow Ups


You can not post to an archived thread.