Home
/
FAQ
/
News
Classifieds
/
Events
Propeller Head Plaza
Technical and scientific discussion of amps, cables and other topics.
[
General
] [
Amp/Pre
] [
Speakers
] [
Tubes
] [
Vinyl
] [
Digital
] [
Hi-Rez
] [
Cables
] [
Tweaks/DIY
] [
Music
]
[
Video
] [
Films
] [
Pro
] [
Vintage
] [
Chat
] [
Reviews
] [
Inmate Systems
] [
Central
] [
Gallery
] [
Search
]
[
Support Our Asylum
] [
Post Message
] [
Forum Rules
]
Text to find:
Welcome! You must be a
registered Inmate
to post in this Asylum.
Previous Page
View:
Threads
Sort:
Date
Update
Unanswered
Last:
Visit
24 Hours
48 Hours
Why you should boycott this forum
-
PaulN
10:25:40 11/15/02
(
10
)
No, I like reading this stuff.
-
Tiny Daddy
16:26:35 11/24/02
(0)
Boycotts Are For Losers...
-
Todd Krieger
21:12:11 11/15/02
(
5
)
Re: Boycotts Are For Losers...
-
Steve Eddy
22:59:19 11/15/02
(
4
)
Re: Boycotts Are For Losers...
-
Todd Krieger
00:27:54 11/16/02
(
3
)
Re: Boycotts Are For Losers...
-
NEAR SOTA
06:41:31 11/16/02
(2)
Re: Boycotts Are For Losers...
-
Phil Tower
07:41:21 11/16/02
(1)
Amen
-
psgary
11:28:18 11/16/02
(0)
No. <nt>
-
Graham C
15:57:18 11/15/02
(0)
Re: Why you should boycott this forum
-
middleground
14:14:09 11/15/02
(0)
diversity rules
-
tcain
11:55:50 11/15/02
(0)
Prop Hat?
-
NEAR SOTA
07:01:34 11/15/02
(0)
Power cords...Anybody done ANY measurements???
-
John Escallier
15:42:29 11/14/02
(
4
)
Re: Power cords...Anybody done ANY measurements???
-
Tiny Daddy
16:28:24 11/24/02
(2)
Excellent!!!!
-
John Escallier
10:57:52 11/25/02
(1)
Re: Excellent!!!!
-
Tiny Daddy
11:52:50 11/25/02
(0)
No apologies, this IS supposed to be a technical forum!!!
-
John Escallier
15:45:18 11/14/02
(0)
A Suggestion Why Some Observations Cannot be Scientifically Verified
-
John C. - Aussie
14:08:04 11/14/02
(
42
)
Some observations do not need or require verification of any sort.
-
jj
18:41:37 11/14/02
(
13
)
Indeed, however....
-
Monstrous Mike
13:15:02 11/15/02
(
12
)
The answer is...
-
sgb
07:57:22 11/16/02
(0)
Err, no, Mike
-
jj
18:12:19 11/15/02
(
9
)
Re: Err, no, Mike
-
Monstrous Mike
15:47:01 11/16/02
(
8
)
No, Mike
-
Norm
16:57:50 11/19/02
(0)
Or about the test. [nt]
-
Ted Smith
16:16:55 11/16/02
(
6
)
Fer chrissakes, I'm assuming a perfect test...
-
Monstrous Mike
09:00:16 11/17/02
(
4
)
Ok. YOU define the perfect test.
-
jj
21:22:37 11/17/02
(2)
The Perfect Test....defined...
-
Monstrous Mike
07:54:34 11/18/02
(1)
Study how taste works.
-
jj
09:34:35 11/18/02
(0)
I believe I am on topic.
-
Ted Smith
09:23:09 11/17/02
(0)
Indeed. (mt)
-
jj
16:56:29 11/16/02
(0)
Re: Indeed, however....
-
Ted Smith
13:25:09 11/15/02
(0)
Not certain what you mean
-
David Aiken
17:06:44 11/14/02
(
26
)
Re: Not certain what you mean
-
Phil Tower
00:08:54 11/15/02
(
6
)
Re: Not certain what you mean
-
jeff mai
00:56:36 11/16/02
(
5
)
Re: Not certain what you mean
-
David Aiken
11:53:11 11/16/02
(1)
Re: Not certain what you mean
-
jeff mai
20:33:42 11/16/02
(0)
Re: Not certain what you mean
-
Phil Tower
06:25:14 11/16/02
(2)
Re: Not certain what you mean
-
sgb
08:16:11 11/16/02
(1)
Re: Not certain what you mean
-
Phil Tower
10:53:43 11/16/02
(0)
An attempt to explain
-
John C. - Aussie
00:02:22 11/15/02
(
16
)
Re: An attempt to explain
-
chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com
06:34:29 11/17/02
(0)
Re: An attempt to explain
-
David Aiken
14:23:01 11/15/02
(0)
Re: An attempt to explain
-
Tom N.
06:59:58 11/15/02
(1)
Re: An attempt to explain
-
Phil Tower
08:18:13 11/15/02
(0)
Re: An attempt to explain
-
Phil Tower
00:23:18 11/15/02
(
11
)
Re: An attempt to explain
-
sgb
08:30:27 11/16/02
(1)
Re: An attempt to explain
-
Phil Tower
10:00:27 11/16/02
(0)
Re: An attempt to explain
-
jeff mai
01:08:03 11/16/02
(
8
)
Re: An attempt to explain
-
Phil Tower
06:29:55 11/16/02
(
7
)
Re: An attempt to explain
-
Monstrous Mike
08:06:10 11/18/02
(1)
Re: An attempt to explain
-
Phil Tower
10:21:39 11/18/02
(0)
No!
-
David Aiken
12:15:41 11/16/02
(
4
)
Re: No!
-
Phil Tower
12:26:11 11/16/02
(
3
)
Re: No!
-
David Aiken
13:50:29 11/16/02
(2)
Re: No!
-
Phil Tower
15:17:17 11/16/02
(1)
Re: No!
-
David Aiken
23:50:51 11/16/02
(0)
Whoa!!!
-
John Escallier
18:25:18 11/14/02
(1)
But that's a different issue…
-
David Aiken
23:13:36 11/14/02
(0)
Re: A Suggestion Why Some Observations Cannot be Scientifically Verified
-
John Escallier
15:16:30 11/14/02
(0)
This is to Phil Tower and whoever else cares....
-
Monstrous Mike
14:29:53 11/13/02
(
18
)
Wireworld Comparator
-
Atexanathome
17:31:03 11/20/02
(0)
Re: This is to Phil Tower and whoever else cares....
-
john curl
10:15:43 11/14/02
(
3
)
Re: This is to Phil Tower and whoever else cares....
-
Monstrous Mike
09:03:28 11/17/02
(1)
Re: This is to Phil Tower and whoever else cares....
-
Phil Tower
20:42:42 11/17/02
(0)
Sorry John, but you are wrong!!!!!
-
kevb
23:10:34 11/16/02
(0)
Why & who says what?
-
NEAR SOTA
01:17:27 11/14/02
(0)
Re: This is to Phil Tower and whoever else cares....
-
RGA
20:22:22 11/13/02
(0)
Re: This is to Phil Tower and whoever else cares....
-
Rod M
18:09:40 11/13/02
(
6
)
Actually, not quite.
-
jj
21:36:41 11/13/02
(0)
Rod you are a genius !!
-
Penguin
18:50:29 11/13/02
(
4
)
Re: Rod you are a genius !!
-
eico1
20:33:23 11/13/02
(
3
)
You do not need DBT for that.
-
Penguin
05:47:27 11/14/02
(2)
Re: You do not need DBT for that.
-
John Escallier
15:18:33 11/14/02
(1)
Cute :-)~
-
Penguin
15:53:24 11/14/02
(0)
Re: This is to Phil Tower and whoever else cares....
-
Phil Tower
15:07:24 11/13/02
(
3
)
Toole, CRC work, etc.
-
jj
18:13:23 11/13/02
(2)
Gotta Ask....
-
kevb
00:07:12 11/17/02
(1)
WEll connectors ARE important...
-
jj
16:07:47 11/17/02
(0)
Human hearing: directionality parameters
-
John Escallier
20:05:36 11/12/02
(
23
)
Re: Human hearing: directionality parameters
-
Jitter_by_Coffee
09:12:49 11/14/02
(
11
)
Twenty microsecond directionality capability.
-
John Escallier
10:02:26 11/14/02
(
10
)
Maybe this will help too...
-
Jitter_by_Coffee
09:16:50 11/15/02
(2)
Read that a few weeks ago.
-
John Escallier
09:33:38 11/15/02
(1)
Re: Read that a few weeks ago.
-
Jitter_by_Coffee
15:42:01 11/15/02
(0)
John, some issues...
-
jj
17:46:24 11/14/02
(
6
)
Aggh. Typo in my article above. MICROSECONDS.
-
jj
01:04:48 11/16/02
(0)
Possible trickery afoot?
-
John Escallier
07:35:48 11/15/02
(1)
No problem there.
-
jj
18:14:35 11/15/02
(0)
Cheeze wiz
-
John Escallier
18:30:25 11/14/02
(2)
Hmm. Do you mean difference in lengths of cables?
-
jj
18:43:20 11/14/02
(1)
no.
-
John Escallier
19:29:48 11/14/02
(0)
More numbers.
-
jj
18:26:39 11/13/02
(2)
Re: More numbers.
-
John Escallier
19:09:28 11/13/02
(1)
Re: More numbers.
-
Rod M
19:23:24 11/13/02
(0)
Re: Human hearing: directionality parameters
-
Monstrous Mike
09:11:01 11/13/02
(1)
Re: Human hearing: directionality parameters
-
John Escallier
09:28:04 11/13/02
(0)
Very cool to look at.
-
driver
00:20:51 11/13/02
(
3
)
We all got a kick from this at my office! -t
-
The Killer Piglet
10:21:12 11/14/02
(0)
Very cool indeed!
-
Duke
14:55:10 11/13/02
(1)
Well, they were half correct
-
E-Stat
13:58:59 11/14/02
(0)
Re: Human hearing: directionality parameters
-
Ted Smith
21:57:15 11/12/02
(1)
Interesting.
-
John Escallier
04:46:07 11/13/02
(0)
Well, you don't like DBTs. Let's try another approach.
-
Phil Tower
16:40:08 11/12/02
(
6
)
perhaps my favorite SNL skit
-
darkstar
06:57:23 11/13/02
(0)
Letting a couple pints out of people who hear no differences ?
-
Penguin
19:08:59 11/12/02
(
4
)
Re: Letting a couple pints out of people who hear no differences ?
-
Phil Tower
19:43:09 11/12/02
(
3
)
Re: Letting a couple pints out of people who hear no differences ?
-
RGA
20:29:05 11/13/02
(0)
You could be spanked or spank yourself also!
-
NEAR SOTA
10:06:59 11/13/02
(1)
Oh, it hurts so good.
-
Phil Tower
11:26:13 11/13/02
(0)
Human hearing
-
middleground
07:35:03 11/12/02
(
23
)
20khz sine vs. square
-
kvk
09:52:54 11/13/02
(0)
Re: Human hearing
-
centurymantra
11:13:21 11/12/02
(0)
Re: Human hearing
-
jk
09:56:37 11/12/02
(1)
Re: Human hearing
-
John Escallier
15:48:21 11/14/02
(0)
Some morsels
-
Penguin
09:23:41 11/12/02
(
18
)
Re: Some morsels
-
middleground
10:43:15 11/12/02
(
17
)
Re: Some morsels
-
Hafdef
20:48:30 11/12/02
(
13
)
Re: Some morsels
-
middleground
07:58:58 11/13/02
(
12
)
No…
-
David Aiken
12:00:51 11/13/02
(
11
)
Re: No…
-
Pat D
08:27:35 11/17/02
(2)
I'm dubious about that possibility
-
David Aiken
23:25:48 11/17/02
(1)
Re: I'm dubious about that possibility
-
Pat D
06:45:16 11/18/02
(0)
Re: No…
-
John Escallier
19:14:00 11/13/02
(
7
)
I doubt that US would..
-
Penguin
16:10:55 11/14/02
(2)
Alas, if it were only so easy..
-
John Escallier
18:41:26 11/14/02
(1)
Agree..`
-
Penguin
06:14:10 11/15/02
(0)
Re: No…
-
David Aiken
22:37:51 11/13/02
(
3
)
I did that
-
John Escallier
15:27:44 11/14/02
(2)
Hey man
-
Phil Tower
00:34:24 11/15/02
(1)
They were Klipsh corner horns.
-
John Escallier
15:33:07 11/18/02
(0)
Re: Some morsels
-
John Escallier
11:22:39 11/12/02
(0)
Sum and difference signals
-
Duke
11:20:01 11/12/02
(1)
Re: Sum and difference signals
-
Hafdef
18:50:28 11/12/02
(0)
Some questions on double blind testing.
-
Phil Tower
03:10:40 11/12/02
(
46
)
Um, err...
-
jj
17:53:15 11/14/02
(1)
Re: Um, err...
-
Rod M
18:34:59 11/14/02
(0)
Umm
-
RGA
20:02:04 11/13/02
(
8
)
Total stuff and nonsense!
-
jj
18:27:40 11/15/02
(1)
Re: Total stuff and nonsense!
-
RGA
14:21:54 11/16/02
(0)
Re: Umm
-
Phil Tower
07:05:13 11/14/02
(
5
)
Sorry, Phil, but the article above yours in the thread
-
jj
18:30:08 11/15/02
(
4
)
Re: Sorry, Phil, but the article above yours in the thread
-
Phil Tower
06:32:03 11/16/02
(
3
)
I mean RGA's post that you responded to.
-
jj
13:37:23 11/16/02
(2)
Re: I mean RGA's post that you responded to.
-
RGA
14:40:53 11/16/02
(1)
Um ...
-
jj
16:59:07 11/16/02
(0)
Some of my answers....
-
Monstrous Mike
09:18:06 11/13/02
(0)
What do you conclude if DBT results show even a big random sample hears no difference?
-
Norm
08:04:25 11/13/02
(1)
Re: What do you conclude if DBT results show even a big random sample hears no difference?
-
Phil Tower
08:28:22 11/13/02
(0)
Re: Your all-capped proposition
-
Bruce from DC
13:19:06 11/12/02
(
3
)
Re: Your all-capped proposition
-
Phil Tower
15:50:45 11/12/02
(2)
Re: You've lost me here, Phil
-
Bruce from DC
07:43:44 11/13/02
(1)
Re: You've lost me here, Phil
-
Phil Tower
08:06:22 11/13/02
(0)
I wish you had numbered your points......
-
Jitter_by_Coffee
07:50:10 11/12/02
(0)
OK I will give it a shot
-
Robert Hamel
07:45:51 11/12/02
(0)
Reminds me of a Methods class I took about thirty-
-
rcrump
04:13:27 11/12/02
(
25
)
One more thing, while I'm at it.
-
Phil Tower
05:09:58 11/12/02
(
23
)
Re: One more thing, while I'm at it.
-
rcrump
06:39:23 11/12/02
(
22
)
Re: One more thing, while I'm at it.
-
Jitter_by_Coffee
07:59:06 11/12/02
(
8
)
Re: One more thing, while I'm at it.
-
Ubiquitous Skittercat ;,,,~
19:32:49 11/12/02
(
7
)
Re: One more thing, while I'm at it.
-
Dan Banquer
09:40:55 11/14/02
(0)
Re: One more thing, while I'm at it.
-
Jitter_by_Coffee
20:44:15 11/13/02
(0)
I believe it is the tests that are flawed, not the equipment
-
E-Stat
14:47:59 11/13/02
(
4
)
Re: I believe it is the tests that are flawed, not the equipment
-
Jitter_by_Coffee
20:38:26 11/13/02
(
3
)
Therein lies the challenge
-
E-Stat
03:50:55 11/14/02
(2)
Re: Therein lies the challenge
-
Jitter_by_Coffee
08:58:01 11/14/02
(1)
We certainly agree here
-
E-Stat
13:44:27 11/14/02
(0)
Re: One more thing, while I'm at it.
-
Phil Tower
06:55:38 11/12/02
(
12
)
That is the problem, too much
-
rcrump
07:10:59 11/12/02
(
11
)
Re: That is the problem, too much
-
Phil Tower
07:51:01 11/12/02
(
10
)
I think I'll start my own camp Phil...
-
rcrump
08:11:38 11/12/02
(
9
)
I've already formed my own camp of one....
-
Phil Tower
08:25:19 11/12/02
(
8
)
Re: I've already formed my own camp of one....
-
rcrump
09:54:17 11/12/02
(
7
)
I have a suggestion...
-
Jitter_by_Coffee
15:39:09 11/12/02
(
6
)
Re: I have a suggestion...
-
Rod M
08:38:47 11/14/02
(
3
)
Re: I have a suggestion...
-
Jitter_by_Coffee
08:54:31 11/14/02
(2)
Re: I have a suggestion...
-
Rod M
11:25:17 11/14/02
(1)
Re: I have a suggestion...
-
Jitter_by_Coffee
09:20:21 11/15/02
(0)
Perhaps you need to select a panel of real scientists to ascertain
-
rcrump
16:42:27 11/12/02
(1)
Re: Perhaps you need to select a panel of real scientists to ascertain
-
Jitter_by_Coffee
20:26:17 11/13/02
(0)
Re: Reminds me of a Methods class I took about thirty-
-
Phil Tower
05:05:00 11/12/02
(0)
Euphonic Compression
-
RandyB
18:24:44 11/11/02
(
25
)
Watch out for tweeter distortion
-
Lynn Olson
17:18:20 11/16/02
(1)
Re: Watch out for tweeter distortion
-
RandyB
07:23:48 11/19/02
(0)
Re: Euphonic Compression
-
tcain
09:46:40 11/13/02
(
9
)
Re: Euphonic Compression
-
RandyB
16:32:56 11/13/02
(
8
)
Re: Euphonic Compression
-
tcain
16:50:56 11/13/02
(
7
)
Re: Euphonic Compression
-
RandyB
17:30:51 11/13/02
(
6
)
Re: Euphonic Compression
-
tcain
19:47:35 11/13/02
(
5
)
Re: Euphonic Compression
-
RandyB
21:10:06 11/13/02
(
4
)
Re: Hello...........
-
Art J.
06:16:46 11/14/02
(
3
)
Re: Hello...........
-
RandyB
08:05:55 11/14/02
(2)
Re: Hello...........
-
Art J.
08:43:46 11/14/02
(1)
I'll evaluate Zobel, thanks
-
RandyB
09:20:03 11/14/02
(0)
Driver compression
-
John Escallier
20:20:46 11/12/02
(
3
)
Re: Driver compression
-
RandyB
21:12:56 11/12/02
(2)
Re: Driver compression
-
John Escallier
21:25:51 11/12/02
(1)
Re: Driver compression
-
RandyB
22:17:25 11/12/02
(0)
Re: Euphonic Compression
-
JOEY.
02:15:05 11/12/02
(2)
Re: Euphonic Compression
-
RandyB
07:10:58 11/12/02
(1)
Matching up compression characteristics
-
Duke
11:33:51 11/12/02
(0)
Re: Euphonic Compression
-
Art J.
20:02:03 11/11/02
(
5
)
Re: Euphonic Compression
-
RandyB
21:36:30 11/11/02
(
4
)
Re: Euphonic Compression
-
Bruce from DC
08:35:42 11/12/02
(1)
Re: Euphonic Compression
-
RandyB
14:28:48 11/12/02
(0)
Re: Euphonic Compression
-
Art J.
06:58:40 11/12/02
(1)
Re: Euphonic Compression
-
RandyB
08:05:33 11/12/02
(0)
DBT Testing, Can it be done at home??
-
Robert Hamel
18:03:11 11/10/02
(
42
)
It CAN be done. It's NOT, repeat NOT easy.
-
jj
21:39:30 11/13/02
(0)
Issues
-
audioengr
21:12:48 11/11/02
(1)
Re: Issues
-
eico1
18:55:05 11/12/02
(0)
Some DBT are not needed.The change is apparent
-
NEAR SOTA
09:37:16 11/11/02
(0)
Yes, but
-
Jitter_by_Coffee
07:03:29 11/11/02
(
32
)
Also, just for further reference on the issue of "training" and importance of DBTs...
-
Phil Tower
11:14:39 11/11/02
(0)
Good point on the training
-
Robert Hamel
10:36:08 11/11/02
(0)
Re: Yes, but
-
Rod M
08:13:13 11/11/02
(
29
)
Re: Yes, but
-
Jitter_by_Coffee
18:47:15 11/11/02
(
28
)
No training?
-
E-Stat
14:57:58 11/13/02
(
10
)
Re: No training?
-
Jitter_by_Coffee
20:46:04 11/13/02
(
9
)
Re: No training?
-
Rod M
08:18:18 11/14/02
(
5
)
Re: No training?
-
Jitter_by_Coffee
09:18:18 11/14/02
(
4
)
My apologies for the choice of generic name
-
E-Stat
13:52:22 11/14/02
(
3
)
Re: My apologies for the choice of generic name
-
Jitter_by_Coffee
09:24:38 11/15/02
(0)
Re: My apologies for the choice of generic name
-
Rod M
14:14:38 11/14/02
(1)
Re: My apologies for the choice of generic name
-
Jitter_by_Coffee
09:23:50 11/15/02
(0)
Simple
-
E-Stat
03:43:21 11/14/02
(2)
Re: Simple
-
Phil Tower
12:34:25 11/16/02
(1)
I'm amused by...
-
E-Stat
17:27:33 11/16/02
(0)
Your tests are meaningless....
-
Rod M
08:03:23 11/12/02
(
16
)
Where was I.
-
Jitter_by_Coffee
21:08:13 11/13/02
(2)
Re: Where was I.
-
Rod M
07:59:14 11/14/02
(1)
Re: Where was I.
-
Jitter_by_Coffee
09:04:05 11/14/02
(0)
Re: Your tests are meaningless....
-
eico1
20:11:04 11/12/02
(
11
)
That's what training is for, to learn how to use the equipment.
-
jj
18:02:47 11/13/02
(
10
)
Sorry, that's wrong. That's PART of what training is for.
-
jj
18:03:59 11/13/02
(
9
)
Re: Sorry, that's wrong. That's PART of what training is for.
-
Jitter_by_Coffee
20:49:18 11/13/02
(
8
)
LISTENER TRAINING is what I'm talking about.
-
jj
21:32:35 11/13/02
(
7
)
Re: LISTENER TRAINING is what I'm talking about.
-
Jitter_by_Coffee
09:20:05 11/14/02
(
6
)
Doggonit, I hate computers sometimes.....
-
Jitter_by_Coffee
09:24:17 11/14/02
(
5
)
Err, to be clear...
-
jj
17:56:59 11/14/02
(
4
)
Re: Err, to be clear...
-
Jitter_by_Coffee
09:26:35 11/15/02
(
3
)
Err. No. If we're talking about the most sensitive tests...
-
jj
18:16:07 11/15/02
(2)
Re: Err. No. If we're talking about the most sensitive tests...
-
Jitter_by_Coffee
07:03:03 11/18/02
(1)
Really? What's your controls and their result?
-
jj
09:36:38 11/18/02
(0)
Uhm, sorry, but yes, they are.
-
Jitter_by_Coffee
15:51:42 11/12/02
(0)
Re: DBT Testing, Can it be done at home??
-
Tom N.
06:36:46 11/11/02
(0)
Re: DBT Testing, Can it be done at home??
-
Monstrous Mike
20:43:39 11/10/02
(2)
Re: DBT Testing, Can it be done at home??
-
Phil Tower
05:45:15 11/15/02
(0)
Glad to see I am not alone.
-
Robert Hamel
10:30:38 11/11/02
(0)
Re: DBT Testing, Can it be done at home??
-
Timbo in Oz
19:49:33 11/10/02
(0)
Testing the waters: Skin effect Note:disclaimer at the end
-
John Escallier
17:55:17 11/10/02
(
78
)
Want an answer ? Read: The Pooge Chronicles
-
Sean
23:08:13 11/10/02
(
3
)
Re: Want an answer ? Read: The Pooge Chronicles
-
HiFi Guy
09:23:17 11/13/02
(0)
Re: Want an answer ? Read: The Pooge Chronicles
-
john curl
10:13:18 11/12/02
(1)
Re: Want an answer ? Read: The Pooge Chronicles
-
john curl
10:15:05 11/12/02
(0)
Guess I must be deaf, but I have been
-
rcrump
20:14:19 11/10/02
(
73
)
Re: Guess I must be deaf, but I have been
-
HiFi Guy
09:30:14 11/13/02
(0)
is that recomendation based on the '95 paper?
-
John Escallier
21:03:01 11/11/02
(
6
)
Re: is that recomendation based on the '95 paper?
-
john curl
21:40:45 11/11/02
(
5
)
Skin
-
John Escallier
10:49:52 11/12/02
(2)
My partner is a bookworm and
-
rcrump
11:21:44 11/12/02
(1)
lets see. if you are corrupted....
-
John Escallier
14:42:07 11/12/02
(0)
Re: is that recomendation based on the '95 paper?
-
BTW
05:02:58 11/12/02
(1)
Re: is that recomendation based on the '95 paper?
-
john curl
08:53:21 11/12/02
(0)
16 Ga Silver Speaker wires
-
Paul in Sterling
19:21:39 11/11/02
(2)
Re: 16 Ga Silver Speaker wires
-
rcrump
20:30:55 11/11/02
(1)
Thank you Sir.
-
Paul in Sterling
20:44:27 11/11/02
(0)
Funny you should say this now ...
-
BobM
05:41:35 11/11/02
(1)
CAT 5 CABLE!!! Doesn't that have two different pitches????
-
John Escallier
21:14:58 11/12/02
(0)
Re: Guess I must be deaf, but I have been
-
Phil Tower
05:30:50 11/11/02
(
35
)
Of course DBT's can't verify some of that!
-
jj
18:01:24 11/14/02
(
4
)
Re: Of course DBT's can't verify some of that!
-
Phil Tower
23:09:39 11/14/02
(
3
)
Hm.
-
jj
18:17:56 11/15/02
(2)
Re: Hm.
-
Phil Tower
07:09:10 11/16/02
(1)
Well, any test needs to be reviewed.
-
jj
13:40:17 11/16/02
(0)
Well I guess i'll just go back and continue to
-
rcrump
05:54:03 11/11/02
(
29
)
Re: Well I guess i'll just go back and continue to
-
Phil Tower
08:30:30 11/11/02
(
28
)
What Limitations? (nt)
-
rcrump
08:48:49 11/11/02
(
27
)
Re: What Limitations? (nt)
-
Phil Tower
09:06:17 11/11/02
(
26
)
Re: What Limitations? (nt)
-
Rod M
09:24:57 11/11/02
(
25
)
To Rod and Bob:
-
Phil Tower
10:57:29 11/11/02
(
23
)
Phil, you missed the point altogether....I would
-
rcrump
12:46:17 11/11/02
(
22
)
Re: Phil, you missed the point altogether....I would
-
john curl
21:17:28 11/11/02
(0)
Re: Phil, you missed the point altogether....I would
-
Jitter_by_Coffee
18:40:41 11/11/02
(
15
)
It is my listening hat that allows me to hear
-
rcrump
20:03:23 11/11/02
(
14
)
Re: It is my listening hat that allows me to hear
-
Jitter_by_Coffee
07:31:02 11/12/02
(
3
)
There is something wrong here..
-
Penguin
15:21:20 11/12/02
(2)
Re: There is something wrong here..
-
Jitter_by_Coffee
21:23:20 11/13/02
(0)
Re: There is something wrong here..
-
john curl
18:08:55 11/12/02
(0)
Re: It is my listening hat that allows me to hear
-
Phil Tower
02:13:40 11/12/02
(
4
)
I think part of the problem is that people assume…
-
David Aiken
14:22:35 11/12/02
(2)
Re: I think part of the problem is that people assume…
-
John Escallier
19:21:56 11/12/02
(0)
Re: I think part of the problem is that people assume…
-
Phil Tower
19:21:27 11/12/02
(0)
I'm getting old and glad I did most of the work
-
rcrump
02:53:03 11/12/02
(0)
So...R Crump is a fan of R. Crumb....
-
john dem
01:02:59 11/12/02
(1)
Bought those Blues trading cards from Ramblin' Jack Elliot when he
-
rcrump
02:16:45 11/12/02
(0)
Your hat has a problem...
-
Penguin
22:24:43 11/11/02
(2)
The hat has been cryoed and
-
rcrump
03:49:41 11/12/02
(1)
Excellllllente :-) (nt).
-
Penguin
06:46:06 11/12/02
(0)
Re: Phil, you missed the point altogether....I would
-
Phil Tower
14:23:36 11/11/02
(
4
)
Phil, I'm trying to spur someone with the best test
-
rcrump
15:38:21 11/11/02
(
3
)
And Im trying to spur the people with the best "mind gear"
-
John Escallier
21:00:32 11/12/02
(2)
Re: And Im trying to spur the people with the best "mind gear"
-
Phil Tower
07:34:40 11/13/02
(1)
Re: And Im trying to spur the people with the best "mind gear"
-
John Escallier
09:57:41 11/13/02
(0)
That is
-
rcrump
09:54:20 11/11/02
(0)
Re: Guess I must be deaf, but I have been
-
Monstrous Mike
20:48:22 11/10/02
(
23
)
See if this helps....
-
rcrump
05:34:24 11/11/02
(1)
Topic...Definitely on.
-
John Escallier
16:47:00 11/12/02
(0)
In plain English....
-
Sean
23:25:20 11/10/02
(
16
)
Path length delays
-
John Escallier
15:56:06 11/11/02
(
15
)
Re: Path length delays
-
Sean
21:18:06 11/11/02
(2)
A less hurried response.
-
John Escallier
06:14:28 11/12/02
(0)
Re: Path length delays
-
John Escallier
21:34:04 11/11/02
(0)
John, i think we are not nailing down enough variables.
-
Penguin
17:12:16 11/11/02
(
11
)
Path delays
-
John Escallier
20:56:53 11/11/02
(
10
)
Re: Path delays
-
Penguin
22:08:23 11/11/02
(
9
)
Re: Path delays
-
John Escallier
12:29:42 11/12/02
(
6
)
I would...
-
Penguin
15:06:08 11/12/02
(
5
)
Re: I would...
-
John Escallier
16:01:01 11/12/02
(
4
)
I would vary the four conductors in legth..
-
Penguin
17:56:52 11/12/02
(
3
)
Sorry, I wasn't very clear in my question.
-
John Escallier
18:36:21 11/12/02
(2)
I was talking about rather small differences.
-
Penguin
19:06:33 11/12/02
(1)
Re: I was talking about rather small differences.
-
John Escallier
19:27:51 11/12/02
(0)
Re: Path delays
-
Jitter_by_Coffee
08:32:22 11/12/02
(1)
It still produces EM fileds :-).
-
Penguin
12:16:42 11/12/02
(0)
Is this what we're going to discuss?
-
Mwalsdor@cscc.edu
22:00:09 11/10/02
(
3
)
Re: Is this what we're going to discuss?
-
Monstrous Mike
07:47:10 11/11/02
(1)
Re: Is this what we're going to discuss?
-
Mwalsdor@cscc.edu
09:05:31 11/11/02
(0)
Re: Is this what we're going to discuss?
-
Duster
00:13:51 11/11/02
(0)
what's wrong with tubes?
-
some young guy
17:10:16 11/10/02
(
17
)
Re: what's wrong with tubes?
-
Kiefer74
04:14:05 11/15/02
(0)
Nothing, why? (nt
-
garth
00:38:33 11/12/02
(0)
They have a higher rate of return over the past two years.....
-
Chris Garrett
10:32:07 11/11/02
(1)
no dought, it's the only investment i've made that's made money this year...
-
some young guy
14:09:58 11/11/02
(0)
You mean other than....
-
Jitter_by_Coffee
06:46:37 11/11/02
(
7
)
And look better under spectral analysis (nt)
-
rcrump
07:23:51 11/11/02
(
6
)
If not, they do in an unlit room(nt)
-
Jitter_by_Coffee
11:43:31 11/11/02
(
5
)
If a frog had wings, he wouldn't bump his ass (nt)
-
E-Stat
15:53:07 11/13/02
(1)
No, but then he'd skin his nose.(nt)
-
Jitter_by_Coffee
20:05:32 11/13/02
(0)
Beauty is merely a lightswitch away! (nt)
-
rcrump
12:48:09 11/11/02
(2)
click...
-
some young guy
14:12:00 11/11/02
(1)
Firebottles!
-
rcrump
16:12:36 11/11/02
(0)
They wear out (nt)
-
Rod M
18:36:05 11/10/02
(2)
Re: They wear out (nt)
-
tecnofossil
17:47:46 11/11/02
(0)
i knew it was something (nt)
-
some young guy
18:56:56 11/10/02
(0)
Re: what's wrong with tubes?
-
[Badfinger]
18:05:30 11/10/02
(1)
oh, now see, that sounds nice.
-
some young guy
18:26:48 11/10/02
(0)
Are vacuum tubes better @ conducting electricity than silicon transistors?
-
Chris Garrett
16:34:55 11/10/02
(
9
)
Re: Are vacuum tubes better @ conducting electricity than silicon transistors?
-
john curl
10:03:34 11/11/02
(
6
)
Well, there is the temperature issue...
-
jj
21:43:44 11/13/02
(0)
Re: Are vacuum tubes better @ conducting electricity than silicon transistors?
-
Ubiquitous Skittercat ;,,,~
15:30:43 11/11/02
(
4
)
I am not aware of a direct coupled tube preamp
-
garth
00:42:17 11/12/02
(0)
Re: Are vacuum tubes better @ conducting electricity than silicon transistors?
-
john curl
17:31:43 11/11/02
(2)
Hey, John did I ever tell you about the time...
-
Charles Hansen
18:57:45 11/12/02
(1)
Re: Hey, John did I ever tell you about the time...
-
john curl
08:16:31 11/13/02
(0)
Now this is different....
-
Monstrous Mike
16:54:10 11/10/02
(1)
I thought you of all people.....
-
Chris Garrett
10:29:09 11/11/02
(0)
Let me know when you guys get over the inital joy
-
Penguin
14:19:26 11/10/02
(
5
)
I'm breathing into a paper bag!
-
The Killer Piglet
15:52:47 11/10/02
(
4
)
did you say you're containg yourself in a paper bag? (nt)
-
some young guy
17:55:02 11/10/02
(
3
)
There ain't no paper bag built can hold me! -t
-
The Killer Piglet
19:01:49 11/10/02
(2)
sometimes we all need to be held (nt)
-
some young guy
19:34:33 11/10/02
(1)
**HUG** (we better be careful, Bagsy may catch us) -t
-
The Killer Piglet
19:36:43 11/10/02
(0)
can i post pix of pig testicles here? (nt)
-
some young guy
12:03:51 11/10/02
(
14
)
give those pics back! -t
-
The Killer Piglet
15:52:06 11/10/02
(1)
sorry kp, i'll send them right over
-
some young guy
17:08:21 11/10/02
(0)
9.5" Pig Balls
-
rcrump
14:13:25 11/10/02
(
9
)
Hey, that's...
-
The Killer Piglet
15:54:40 11/10/02
(0)
Crump you are perverse
-
Tuckers
14:48:06 11/10/02
(
7
)
You know the man who boozes by the company that he
-
rcrump
16:37:49 11/10/02
(
5
)
I have memories of that "poem" from my childhood…
-
David Aiken
00:37:15 11/12/02
(
4
)
Boys of the Lough sang "General Guinness" on Joan
-
rcrump
03:39:42 11/12/02
(
3
)
Thanks…
-
David Aiken
14:26:07 11/12/02
(2)
No words in the liners so might try Boys of the Lough
-
rcrump
14:58:10 11/12/02
(1)
many thanks, will try NT
-
David Aiken
12:03:47 11/13/02
(0)
oh, man! get out of my head! -t
-
The Killer Piglet
15:55:17 11/10/02
(0)
That you would want to . . .
-
psgary
12:08:51 11/10/02
(1)
just testing the waters...
-
some young guy
13:41:04 11/10/02
(0)
The aerodynamic feasibility of a propeller beanie cap.
-
dennzio
07:49:34 11/10/02
(
10
)
I like the hat icon, I think I maye have matching underwear... -t
-
The Killer Piglet
08:28:01 11/10/02
(
9
)
Re: I like the hat icon, I think I maye have matching underwear... -t
-
SETdude
08:32:42 11/10/02
(
8
)
Why do you and KP have matching underwear?
-
Big Dave
09:14:20 11/10/02
(0)
I think he's oiling the hinges on his vinyl suit's drop rear. -t
-
The Killer Piglet
09:08:54 11/10/02
(
6
)
That would be a subject of a diferent forum.
-
Penguin
10:05:58 11/10/02
(
5
)
Re: That would be a subject of a diferent forum.
-
SETdude
05:34:42 11/11/02
(0)
You guy're makin' fun a me, ain't you?
-
Bagsgroove
12:18:38 11/10/02
(
3
)
Re: You guy're makin' fun a me, ain't you?
-
SETdude
16:49:19 11/10/02
(1)
and tubes, electricity, and recording studios. -t
-
The Killer Piglet
17:09:30 11/10/02
(0)
Beats me :-) (nt)
-
Penguin
14:17:34 11/10/02
(0)
Welcome!
-
Rod M
07:04:46 11/10/02
(
35
)
No headphone asylum, but we get this £@!!@%& (nt)!!!
-
Bandit
05:18:43 11/15/02
(
3
)
Inmates voted against a headphone asylum....
-
Rod M
06:29:57 11/15/02
(2)
Looking at the poll, the undecided could swing the vote
-
Bandit
07:56:01 11/15/02
(1)
Re: Looking at the poll, the undecided could swing the vote
-
Rod M
12:57:43 11/15/02
(0)
I figured I'd make at least one post here. Not much on
-
driver
19:54:53 11/12/02
(2)
Keep one eye on the road, the other on the propheads....
-
John Escallier
20:27:04 11/12/02
(1)
Re: Keep one eye on the road, the other on the propheads....
-
driver
00:06:24 11/13/02
(0)
Well Rod, startin to look a little better (nt)
-
John Escallier
19:31:10 11/12/02
(0)
The Forum Name and Restrictions Will Stifle Intended Discussion
-
Todd Krieger
14:54:35 11/10/02
(
10
)
Re: The Forum Name and Restrictions Will Stifle Intended Discussion
-
Rod M
17:06:12 11/10/02
(
4
)
What disturbs me is that "geeks" don't mean the same ting.
-
John Escallier
20:31:51 11/12/02
(0)
Re: The Forum Name and Restrictions Will Stifle Intended Discussion
-
Todd Krieger
18:32:01 11/10/02
(2)
Re: The Forum Name and Restrictions Will Stifle Intended Discussion
-
Rod M
18:46:46 11/10/02
(1)
Let's Sit Back and Enjoy!! <nt>
-
Todd Krieger
20:33:12 11/10/02
(0)
Good idea: "Burden of Proof"
-
PabloP
15:36:13 11/10/02
(0)
I agree - A very badly named Forum................
-
Cut-Throat
14:59:50 11/10/02
(
3
)
The Worst Part is...
-
Todd Krieger
15:15:16 11/10/02
(2)
Very well said! (nt)
-
Cut-Throat
18:00:35 11/10/02
(1)
I'll Go One Further!!
-
Todd Krieger
18:22:24 11/10/02
(0)
boo hisssss
-
PaulN
12:25:50 11/10/02
(2)
Strongly agree
-
cfraser
13:10:38 11/10/02
(1)
There is another side to the same coin..
-
Penguin
16:37:20 11/10/02
(0)
I like the name
-
psgary
12:08:09 11/10/02
(
7
)
I do too.
-
Phil Tower
18:30:11 11/10/02
(
6
)
Re: I do too.
-
Todd Krieger
20:44:12 11/10/02
(2)
Re: I do too.
-
Phil Tower
20:49:08 11/10/02
(1)
With all due respect
-
Mwalsdor@cscc.edu
21:47:21 11/10/02
(0)
Surprised???
-
The Killer Piglet
18:40:17 11/10/02
(2)
Good point
-
Phil Tower
18:47:45 11/10/02
(1)
Yes, excellent Phil...
-
Monstrous Mike
07:49:04 11/11/02
(0)
just curious, how was the name chosen? (nt)
-
BS64
09:52:56 11/10/02
(0)
How about Pocket Protector Heaven for a name ? (NT)
-
Mike B.
08:23:09 11/10/02
(
3
)
Re: How about Pocket Protector Heaven for a name ? (NT)
-
john curl
18:27:56 11/12/02
(0)
Hmmmm......
-
Rod M
09:29:13 11/10/02
(1)
Or how about 'Geeks 'n Tweaks'? <nt>
-
Brian Walsh
15:44:22 11/10/02
(0)
Previous Page
[
Contact Us
] [
Support/Wish List
] [ Copyright © 2003, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
[
General
] [
Speakers
] [
Tubes
] [
Vinyl
] [
Digital
] [
Hi-Rez
] [
Video Asylum
] [
Cables
] [
Tweaks/DIY
] [
Music
] [
Films
]
You can not post to an archived thread.