In Reply to: Re:Isolation and room treatments posted by Bob Lee (QSC) on July 20, 2004 at 14:56:37:
Hi Bob,"I still would like to know whether the vibration-caused clocking errors you mention have been actually observed to be audible."
"Observed to be audible"?
When I say I've sat down and listened and heard the effects, how does that not qualify as "observed to be audible"? Do you know a way of observing a sound other than listening? What do you have such an apparent aversion to spending five minutes actually listening for yourself?Whether about digital or AC or about the effects of vibrations, you speak in theoretical terms and never once mention having listening. I'm sorry Bob, I've really tried to engage in a dialogue but don't know how to continue in the face of your unwillingness to listen.
At this point this thread is wasting both of our time so I am done here. If you ever decide to actually listen, start a new thread and talk about what you actually heard (or didn't hear). Theory isn't of value without practical experience to back it up.
Happy Listening! (and I really mean that)
Barry
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Geez Louise, just Listen! - bdiament 15:08:49 07/20/04 (7)
- Re: Geez Louise, just Listen! - Bob Lee (QSC) 17:25:48 07/20/04 (6)
- How do we know you're you? - bdiament 09:17:28 07/21/04 (5)
- Re: How do we know you're you? - Bob Lee (QSC) 10:09:33 07/21/04 (4)
- Re: How do we know you're you? - bdiament 11:19:53 07/21/04 (3)
- Re: How do we know you're you? - Bob Lee (QSC) 12:13:54 07/21/04 (2)
- Re: How do we know you're you? - bdiament 15:34:40 07/21/04 (1)
- Re: How do we know you're you? - Bob Lee (QSC) 16:16:56 07/21/04 (0)