In Reply to: Re: Vertical array vs trap arrays posted by DSM on December 9, 2004 at 06:36:44:
Dan, the Alpha6 experiments did steer towards a line array for a while, but I found that getting a wide dispersion was not as easy as it seemed. Due to requiring a vertical diffraction slot, the initial horn expansion to the slot was very steep, causing path length cancellations in this area. A trial split throat arrangement seemed to work better, but would neccessitate a complex fibreglass moulding to achieve in practise.After re-reading various line array theory papers, and writings from Tony Andrews and others, plus taking into account the proposed line array would only cover 90 degrees horizontally, I am going back to the trap box idea. Currently working on confining dispersion to 40 degrees horizontal by as narrow as I can get vertical. If the box is built right, one inverted box on top of the first could give a psuedo line for extra spl in the top end in each direction. Still looking at the box running two 1" drivers, two Alpha 6 and maybe two Beta 8 or one Kappa 12 for low mids.
Lots of money certainly would make things easier - I would probably go Resolution 5s over EAW KF940 subs (dream, dream....) :)
Cheers
Graeme
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Vertical array vs trap arrays - Centauri 07:11:52 12/09/04 (5)
- Re: Vertical array vs trap arrays - DSM 07:31:33 12/09/04 (4)
- Re: Line Array Kits - GaryBirch 22:28:34 12/13/04 (3)
- DIY line array - Jim York 16:52:01 12/14/04 (2)
- Re: DIY line array - DSM 08:03:24 12/15/04 (1)
- Re: DIY line array - Jim York 11:56:52 12/15/04 (0)