In Reply to: The SPARS code used to be a standard... posted by Top Jimmy on May 26, 2006 at 16:02:29:
But when was the last time you saw it on a new CD?
What does it has to do with the topic of this thread: a polarity standard does exist, contrastingly to a previous post statement. The fact this standard or furthermore another one is widely used or not has nothing to do with the topic. Fallacy.
Just because there's a "standard" doesn't mean it's infallible.
How could a standard be infallible? It is not a being nor an algorithm: it does not make decisions.
Some mismatch of semantic categories here.
This standard, as all of them just defines a common way of doing things.
Will it solve the issue or not is a completely different topic.
You don't really understand the complexity of the issue.
You're offensive now.
As for you, to complete your mastering the complexity of the issue, maybe some courses of logical thinking would be welcome ?
With a good manners option? ;-)
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Fallacies ! - Jacques 17:03:33 05/26/06 (5)
- Let me point something out to you - Top Jimmy 20:23:18 05/26/06 (4)
- Yes, but... - Jacques 04:22:42 05/27/06 (3)
- Re:+Re:+Re:+Nokian - darvocet 03:34:43 12/16/06 (0)
- Re: Yes, but... - Bob Lee (QSC) 09:23:27 05/30/06 (0)
- Brevior saltare cum deformibus viris est vita - Top Jimmy 01:41:53 05/29/06 (0)