In Reply to: RE: Saracon posted by Mercman on September 11, 2011 at 09:52:07:
I use both methods (3 transports) and software on PC. Hardware is better as I can control quality of components, power supply, and interface. Software doesn't sound as good.
With dsd material, the bandwidth of your replay system is very imortant. I use between 50k and 70k analog filter.
I am not surprised that Saracon converted files sound 'clean', because of the 22k filter. In general, I prefer a much more wide open system where the effects of the filters are moved as far from 20k as possible.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- No.. - fmak 04:48:48 09/12/11 (11)
- RE: No.. - Tony Lauck 10:20:01 09/12/11 (10)
- RE: No..SACD - fmak 10:38:41 09/12/11 (9)
- RE: No..SACD - Tony Lauck 11:06:40 09/12/11 (8)
- I think that it's actually been described, early on, as a "quasi-8 bit" signal, in AES White Papers... - Chris Garrett 11:58:12 09/13/11 (2)
- RE: I think that it's actually been described, early on, as a "quasi-8 bit" signal, in AES White Papers... - Tony Lauck 14:49:53 09/13/11 (1)
- RE: I think that it's actually been described, early on, as a "quasi-8 bit" signal, in AES White Papers... - fmak 08:16:39 09/14/11 (0)
- Sorry, it is you - fmak 11:50:01 09/12/11 (4)
- RE: Sorry, it is you - Mercman 12:08:42 09/12/11 (1)
- RE: Sorry, it is you - fmak 21:35:35 09/12/11 (0)
- RE: Sorry, it is you - Tony Lauck 12:07:43 09/12/11 (1)
- I ignore - fmak 21:37:38 09/12/11 (0)