In Reply to: EMI/RFI, eye patterns, and buffering posted by Tony Lauck on September 8, 2011 at 13:05:34:
"...something that could be tested by running the computer entirely off of batteries if that wasn't already done"Gordon used a Macbook running off it's internal battery for the test he described.
"...since the buffers are supposedly dealing with bits whereas in reality they are dealing with analog signals"
Tony,
Does it seem possible (to you) that poor quality of the analog signal being interpreted/analysed by the USB receiver chip could stress (or otherwise impact) the chip's performance in such a way that other aspects of the DAC's performance (such as it's clocking function) could be impacted?
clay
Edits: 09/09/11
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: EMI/RFI, eye patterns, and buffering - cfmsp 12:52:57 09/09/11 (2)
- RE: EMI/RFI, eye patterns, and buffering - Tony Lauck 13:17:44 09/09/11 (1)
- RE: EMI/RFI, eye patterns, and buffering - cfmsp 14:59:29 09/09/11 (0)