In Reply to: RE: DSD Direct posted by ted_b on February 9, 2012 at 16:52:12:
There are some good DSD recordings out there, but then there are good recordings in every format. They might have been better if they had been made in 176/24 PCM.
The high frequency noise on DSD is a function of the DSD analog to digital converter and how it does noise shaping. One example is the graph linked from Roseval's post, where the noise starts well below 20 kHz and surpasses the noise from 24 bit PCM at a few kilohertz. An argument could even be made that the noise below 20 kHz is worse than with 44/16 digital. Given that there is noise below 20 kHz there is no way to filter this out without affecting the music. The situation gets worse at higher frequencies. Also, the noise is correlated to the musical signal and hence represents distortion rather than background noise. This is an unfortunate property of 1 bit noise shaping, a problem that does not exist with multi-bit PCM formats which can be properly dithered.
IMO Sony did the same thing with 1-bit technology that they did with Redbook: they chose a sample rate that was too low. Had they gone with DSD128 instead of DSD64 I wouldn't be making these comments.
Tony Lauck
"Diversity is the law of nature; no two entities in this universe are uniform." - P.R. Sarkar
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: DSD Direct - Tony Lauck 07:40:34 02/10/12 (0)