Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Possible instance of watermarking? - Christine Tham 13:35:48 05/14/03 (13)

• No. Just remember, you can't hear watermarking. - 9fold 21:10:32 05/15/03 (1)
• I'm sure I read reports where some were able to detect it reliably. - Metralla 07:50:48 05/18/03 (0)
• Nah. The Verance mark tends to 'sharpen' sound, add 'glare', not 'muffling'. It's probably on master - Michi 11:47:12 05/15/03 (7)
• Can anyone confirm if these titles are watermarked? - jeromelang 18:44:12 05/15/03 (5)
• Re: Can anyone confirm if these titles are watermarked? - John Kotches 19:49:06 05/15/03 (4)
• Thanks for the Nightfly info. - jeromelang 22:05:38 05/15/03 (3)
• Re: Thanks for the Nightfly info. - John Kotches 09:38:24 05/16/03 (0)
• Hotel California . . . - Martin 02:24:49 05/16/03 (1)
• The Verance Detector said no. - Michi 03:01:13 05/20/03 (0)
• thanks, first time i've seen anyone describe what watermark sounds like (nt) - Christine Tham 13:55:54 05/15/03 (0)
• mc or stereo? - Frank 14:06:07 05/14/03 (2)
• the fault is in all tracks MLP 5.1, MLP 2.0, DD5.1, DD2.0 (nt) - Christine Tham 05:44:24 05/15/03 (1)
• the fault is in all tracks MLP 5.1, MLP 2.0, DD5.1, DD2.0 - jeromelang 19:04:03 05/15/03 (0)

Follow Ups

• mc or stereo? - Frank 14:06:07 05/14/03 (2)
• the fault is in all tracks MLP 5.1, MLP 2.0, DD5.1, DD2.0 (nt) - Christine Tham 05:44:24 05/15/03 (1)
• the fault is in all tracks MLP 5.1, MLP 2.0, DD5.1, DD2.0 - jeromelang 19:04:03 05/15/03 (0)