In Reply to: Thats good news ... but the mainstream labels need to push this too. posted by vulcanman on May 10, 2003 at 21:30:01:
Why? If you ask guys in the know (Mark Waldrep, Bob Ludwig, David Chesky et al) it's only in the last 12-18 months that 24/192K A/D Convertors reached the level of quality of 24/96K A/D convertors.
So until the newer A/D convertors became available, everyone that cared about a quality product was using 24/96K units.That being said, if you didn't know if a recording was 24/96K or 24/192K would you really be able to spot the difference? While I find 24/192K slightly preferential everytime I've heard it in comparison to 24/96K material it has been a sighted test.
Regards,
John Kotches
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Thats good news ... but the mainstream labels need to push this too. - John Kotches 10:44:47 05/12/03 (2)
- Re: Thats good news ... but the mainstream labels need to push this too. - Eric LeRouge 11:50:02 05/12/03 (1)
- Re: Thats good news ... but the mainstream labels need to push this too. - John Kotches 14:02:20 05/12/03 (0)