In Reply to: Meridian debunk your comments too, seems most scientists do. posted by SnaggS on April 29, 2003 at 15:02:42:
I'm not either. But that doesn't prevent me in spotting these blatand flaws in the AES paper.There is no proof in this document that dsd is better than 24/192 or even 24/96.
You are only fooling yourself.My only beef with dsd is that low 64*fs sample frequency. It should have been at least 128*fs.
You obviously missed the part about the pcm processing in the Sonoma and the Pyramix systems...
Frank
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- You're not a scientist... - Frank 15:22:31 04/29/03 (2)
- Just out of interest, whats your thought on midband - SnaggS 16:19:12 04/29/03 (1)
- PCM - Frank 14:31:00 04/30/03 (0)