In Reply to: Except for..... posted by John Kotches on April 26, 2003 at 08:54:12:
My slight complaints about the cost of buying MLP were just a comment. As it would have been nice to have MLP. I was not suggesting that somehow SACD was better in this regard.My friend and I record about 6 hours a week of radio onto MiniDisc. At 16/48khz with MLP, we could have really crammed alot of music on a DVD-A disk. Also, when archiving Vinyl on DVD-A @ 96k, MLP again would mean more albums per disk.
SACD is clearly not, and will never be a home recording medium.
Daniel.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Ok, let me be clear, DVD-A is much better than SACD for home recording. - SnaggS 18:59:02 04/26/03 (9)
- You can have 7 hours of 16/44.1 music on a DVD-A without MLP - Eric LeRouge 04:38:36 04/27/03 (8)
- ATRAC is not worse - SnaggS 05:05:00 04/27/03 (7)
- I do agree with Snaggle about ATRAC-R - ducati 07:44:27 04/27/03 (3)
- But couldn't I get 14 hours with MLP ? - SnaggS 23:57:41 04/28/03 (2)
- Re: But couldn't I get 14 hours with MLP ? - ducati 06:12:35 04/29/03 (1)
- Argg... MP3 sounds bad :( - SnaggS 08:10:42 04/29/03 (0)
- This is a first, most people say otherwise. But just out of curiosity... - Eric LeRouge 07:43:16 04/27/03 (2)
- Editing on the road - SnaggS 00:01:59 04/29/03 (1)
- Nice friend you have - Eric LeRouge 10:18:08 04/29/03 (0)