Home DVD-Audiobahn

New DVD-Audio music releases and talk about the latest players.

3C better stereo then 2C?

Research seems to support 3C as being better then 2C. One of the original tests was performed by W.B Snow (Bell Laboratories) in 1933. The goal was to reproduce a live concert for an audience 141 miles away. After much experimentation, it was determined that 3C was 'satisfactory'. Snow had thought that a 'curtain' of mics/speakers (1:1) would be optimum. The LP later undid 3C stereo by bring 2C stereo to the masses. So today when we think of stereo as being 2C, it is really just decades of exposure to 2C stereo.

Now you bring up the point of the center channel being a problem due to the placement of the tv. This is true but the tv between your L/R speakers is causing problems with the stereo image anyway so it is difficult to have your cake and eat it too. One of my more significant upgrades for sound was to ditch the tv from between the speakers. Flat panel TVs are becomming a little less expensive and the cost will continue to drop - not yet a cost effective solution.

As this is a DVD-A forum, I will add that having excellent DVD-A recordings that place most of the information in the front 3C will bring us closer to an ideal. The 2C mix (preferably not mix-down) will provide backwards compatibility for those that need or prefer it.

Rod.


This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
  Amplified Parts  


Follow Ups Full Thread
Follow Ups


You can not post to an archived thread.