Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - DVD-A 2 ch. stereo mix ? Which way to go ? - Waynefi 20:13:44 04/08/03 (21)

• "10 !" :o) - oscar 20:18:17 04/09/03 (1)
• "10" is actually the number of stereo records - Eric LeRouge 01:50:26 04/11/03 (0)
• Unbiased Accurate Answer - snaggs 17:48:44 04/09/03 (5)
• God, I knew you'd say something stupid as soon as I read the title of your post - Eric LeRouge 14:26:27 04/10/03 (4)
• YES or NO : Is Stereo mandated ? - SnaggS 17:27:52 04/10/03 (3)
• That was not the question - Eric LeRouge 07:26:47 04/11/03 (1)
• Exactly, left to the bean counters mercy - SnaggS 02:02:04 04/26/03 (0)
• You really don't get it, do you? (nt) - paulcordingley 20:42:17 04/10/03 (0)
• Re: DVD-A 2 ch. stereo mix ? Which way to go ? - RdH 05:32:00 04/09/03 (0)
• DVD-A is DEAD!!!! (I am filling in for Rich, who is away). - Duilawyer 21:48:52 04/08/03 (11)
• Just for the record, I'd like to second that. (Not the 'dead' part, though.) - Michi 01:07:00 04/09/03 (10)
• Re: Just for the record, I'd like to second that. (Not the 'dead' part, though.) - Martin 04:48:56 04/09/03 (9)
• I thought Samsung offered that up as a spec originally... - Michi 12:25:50 04/09/03 (1)
• yes - Joe Murphy Jr 17:52:08 04/09/03 (0)
• Resolution - RdH 10:29:59 04/09/03 (4)
• Re: Resolution - John Kotches 05:32:27 04/13/03 (2)
• Re: Resolution - RdH 12:59:12 04/13/03 (1)
• Re: Resolution - John Kotches 16:08:29 04/13/03 (0)
• Re: Resolution - Frank 10:46:15 04/09/03 (0)
• I too, had thought above 192 there was no audible difference.? nt - Duilawyer 07:07:39 04/09/03 (1)
• Yep. . . . And some 'golden ears' would also apply that to anything above 96kHz . {n.t.} - Martin 09:16:14 04/09/03 (0)

Follow Ups

• Resolution - RdH 10:29:59 04/09/03 (4)
• Re: Resolution - John Kotches 05:32:27 04/13/03 (2)
• Re: Resolution - RdH 12:59:12 04/13/03 (1)
• Re: Resolution - John Kotches 16:08:29 04/13/03 (0)
• Re: Resolution - Frank 10:46:15 04/09/03 (0)