In Reply to: MLP -- so the critics were WRONG after all . . . posted by Martin says on April 8, 2003 at 02:20:45:
...that there would rarely be a problem in practice. Your linked article doesn't refute this, it simply strongly emphasizes that the difficulty is rarely encountered, and admits to a provision in the spec to reduce bit depth in the surround channels to compensate. It seems as though our understanding is unchanged. Mr. Guthrie (and any other engineer with similar misgivings about MLP) is the only person you need to convince. : )
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Who was wrong? A theoretical bitrate problem with MLP was pointed out, with the acknowlegement ... - Methos 10:55:05 04/08/03 (2)
- Re: Who was wrong? A theoretical bitrate problem with MLP was pointed out, with the acknowlegement . - John Kotches 05:37:45 04/13/03 (0)
- I'm referring to the posts made here, not whatever Guthrie may think about MLP. nt - Methos 10:57:59 04/08/03 (0)