HTTP/1.0 200 OK Content-type: text/html
Can't connect to database, trying again....
In Reply to: MLP -- so the critics were WRONG after all . . . posted by Martin says on April 8, 2003 at 02:20:45:
Either format is quantum leaps over what is required to faithfully reproduce anything mastered from analog tape. It's just a big waste of time pissing match. The one getting pissed on is you for getting worked up about it. 8=)
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Who cares? The source media is analog tape which has FAR more flaws than either DVD-A or SACD! - RatFarm 05:15:02 04/08/03 (7)
- how about 16/44.1 PCM? - High-end Dreamer 07:49:58 04/08/03 (3)
- That's not what this thread is about. {nt} - Martin 08:02:03 04/08/03 (2)
- So? I replied to his post, not the "alpha" post - High-end Dreamer 12:20:52 04/08/03 (1)
- Oops -- for some reason I thought it was a reply to one of my posts. {n.t.} - Martin 02:25:16 04/09/03 (0)
- Re: Who cares? The source media is analog tape which has FAR more flaws than either DVD-A or SACD! - Martin says 06:59:09 04/08/03 (2)
- Are you pissing on me? ;-) nt - RatFarm 07:07:42 04/08/03 (1)
- Now that depends on whether you believed Guthrie's speech. ¦ -) {nt} - Martin says 07:22:27 04/08/03 (0)