Topic - Is MLP flawed? - uzun 09:41:11 04/03/03 (27)

• This should settle the issue . . . - Martin says 02:59:15 04/08/03 (0)
• is anything perfect? (nt) - mark111 08:25:14 04/05/03 (1)
• Its not just MLP though... proove me wrong - SnaggS 18:50:26 04/05/03 (0)
• Not flawed, and I suggest a read of this would be useful . . . - Martin says 05:19:22 04/04/03 (4)
• This doesn't address the fact HF is rolled off - SnaggS 18:15:43 04/05/03 (1)
• Re: This doesn't address the fact HF is rolled off - NotMe 16:48:56 04/07/03 (0)
• the use of a FIFO is mandatory... - tunenut 10:33:36 04/04/03 (1)
• No... - Frank 11:34:49 04/04/03 (0)
• No, - Frank 10:38:56 04/03/03 (1)
• Re: No, - RdH 12:02:18 04/03/03 (0)
• Re: Is MLP flawed? - Dave P 10:37:33 04/03/03 (0)
• don't know about MLP specifically... - tunenut 10:11:21 04/03/03 (6)
• Limiting bandwidth before encode is still better than lowering the sample rate. - Michi 17:15:47 04/03/03 (0)
• If implemented correctly there will be no problem. - Audio_RD_Engineer 14:48:20 04/03/03 (4)
• But you will never ever get "master tape" sound... - SnaggS 18:17:05 04/05/03 (3)
• Re: But you will never ever get "master tape" sound... - Martin says 05:16:23 04/06/03 (2)
• Why do we get all the lunies? - Eric LeRouge 11:02:30 04/06/03 (1)
• Beats me! :) {n.t.} - Martin says 07:13:31 04/07/03 (0)
• Re: Is MLP flawed? - HighEndWire 09:48:12 04/03/03 (8)
• Re: Is MLP flawed? - uzun 10:20:55 04/03/03 (7)
• slight clarification... - tunenut 10:56:26 04/03/03 (6)
• But again not with the MLP spec, but the DVD spec. - Michi 17:24:16 04/03/03 (5)
• the reason this would be considered an MLP flaw, if it exists... - tunenut 18:23:41 04/03/03 (4)
• agreed.. - Dave P 19:29:03 04/03/03 (3)
• Re: agreed../ MLP encoder features - Mathias Myka 22:43:51 04/03/03 (0)
• No, you are wrong. Have you guys even read the MLP paper? - Joe Friday 20:32:32 04/03/03 (1)
• semantics - Dave P 06:52:43 04/04/03 (0)