In Reply to: You want an apology? posted by Charles Hansen on December 20, 2005 at 22:17:21:
I think you may have misinterpreted the following line: "The HDCD decoder uses an interpolation filter complementary to the anti-alias filters used in the A/D filter switching process."I think if you read this as "The HDCD decoder [dynamically selects] an interpolation filter [that matches] the anti-alias filters used in the A/D filter switching process", you will find that your confusion over singular vs plural and the use of the word complementary resolves itself. Hey, the sentence now makes complete sense!
*** All it tells you is that the signal level never exceeded -6 dBFS during the A/D conversion process, regardless of whether "peak extend" was used or not. ***
Again, this is rather fanciful. How many CDs have you encountered where the signal never exceeds -6dBFS in the mastering stage? Hmmm?
You seem to be resorting to tortured justifications to support your points. Isn't is easier just to admit you are wrong?
*** If you think Ayre should design a DVD player using DSP chips designed for surround-sound processors (that will only be available five years after the player has been designed), then I think you may have a more than just an issue with reading comprehension. ***
Why do you keep referring to a DVD player you designed in 1998? Surely we are talking about today, when such chips are easily available and at low cost? Again, maybe it is you who has an issue with reading comprehension. No one (except perhaps yourself) is referring to what you may or may not have done in 1998, we are talking about your incorrect statements about HDCD *today*.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Perhaps it is you who has reading comprehension issues? - Christine Tham 00:59:31 12/22/05 (18)
- This is just silly - Charles Hansen 09:08:41 12/22/05 (17)
- Who is being silly? - Christine Tham 11:49:06 12/22/05 (16)
- That would be you - Charles Hansen 20:27:20 12/22/05 (15)
- Re: That would be you - Christine Tham 15:23:38 12/23/05 (14)
- Re: That would be you - Charles Hansen 20:14:53 12/23/05 (13)
- Re: That would be you - Christine Tham 00:01:07 12/24/05 (12)
- Figure 3: Digital rip of an HDCD without Peak Extend - Christine Tham 00:09:39 12/24/05 (9)
- Figure 4: Output of WMP (no Peak Extend) - Christine Tham 00:11:08 12/24/05 (8)
- By the way, here are some stats on the non decoded vs decoded outputs - Christine Tham 00:28:38 12/24/05 (7)
- Thanks for posting these graphs - Charles Hansen 10:51:35 12/24/05 (6)
- Re: Thanks for posting these graphs - Christine Tham 12:12:00 12/24/05 (5)
- This is just silly - Charles Hansen 14:46:22 12/24/05 (4)
- HDCD is defined by the patent, not the implementation - Christine Tham 22:38:00 12/24/05 (3)
- Oh, that's right... - Charles Hansen 13:06:23 12/25/05 (2)
- And your point is? - Christine Tham 15:31:48 01/03/06 (1)
- Yep, yep, and yep. - Charles Hansen 19:43:56 01/03/06 (0)
- Figure 1: Digital rip of an HDCD with Peak Extend - Christine Tham 00:04:18 12/24/05 (1)
- Figure 2: WMP decoded output of the track - Christine Tham 00:06:28 12/24/05 (0)