In Reply to: Re: another explanation posted by JamesB on November 24, 2005 at 17:35:46:
where i stated "this problem is not just in DSD, it's inherent in any sigma delta ADC design."in other words, 99% of all PCM ADCs in use today.
If you like, I can supply you references (links to various papers and application notes) published by TI/BB, Cirrus Logic etc.
There's a recent AN from BB that specifically talks about this noise and what to do with it. The most common solution appears to be to apply noise shaping plus a low pass filter that is the inverse of the noise curve in the ADC (in other words, frequency response above 20kHz will therefore be attenuated).
The only ADCs that do not suffer from ultrasonic noise are the resistive ladder type designs which unfortunately suffer from low level linearity issues.
Unfortunately, there's no such thing as a free lunch.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- you missed out on my last paragraph - Christine Tham 20:21:53 11/24/05 (13)
- the big difference - tunenut 15:45:35 11/25/05 (3)
- Re: the big difference - Christine Tham 18:41:35 11/28/05 (2)
- Tunenut is on the right track.. - Frank.. 00:08:56 11/29/05 (1)
- The question is: are *you* on the "right track"? (nt) - Christine Tham 19:37:42 11/30/05 (0)
- Re: you missed out on my last paragraph - JamesB 21:05:25 11/24/05 (8)
- Re: you missed out on my last paragraph - Christine Tham 21:52:08 11/24/05 (7)
- Not quite correct. - Frank.. 23:42:47 11/24/05 (5)
- "Tortured rationalization" (nt) - Christine Tham 18:42:54 11/28/05 (4)
- You are spreading wrong assumptions. - Frank.. 23:37:14 11/28/05 (3)
- Or perhaps ... - Christine Tham 20:38:51 11/30/05 (2)
- Nothing wrong with the application notes... - Frank.. 00:54:11 12/01/05 (1)
- Sorry, Frank, more "tortured rationalizaion" - Christine Tham 15:14:26 12/02/05 (0)
- Sorry forgot to attach links - Christine Tham 22:04:07 11/24/05 (0)