In Reply to: It's like shooting fish in a barrel posted by racerguy on September 10, 2005 at 13:00:20:
>> but the assumption isn't fact. It could have been just the master that was digital." <<You used the word "could". So you were assuming too.
But I have now given you the "fact", as to how that digital master was arrived at, do you have any comment about that fact? Aren't you grateful that you now know -- especially after all these years of your speculation ;-)
We're still waiting for a useful contribution from you.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: It's like shooting fish in a barrel - Martin419 13:21:54 09/10/05 (5)
- The "we" is just you - racerguy 13:23:12 09/10/05 (4)
- Racer, for the sake of civility . . . - Martin419 06:57:19 09/11/05 (3)
- Civility? - racerguy 10:55:19 09/11/05 (2)
- Re: Civility? - Martin419 02:33:22 09/12/05 (1)
- Hey Martin and Racertwit.... - Ghost of my former self 12:20:14 09/13/05 (0)