In Reply to: You just rattled a series of compromises ... posted by Christine Tham on October 25, 2004 at 03:30:40:
So why include dts in your calculation when it's not on offer in these UMG releases anyway.Also I somehow suspect that these titles where not recorded with 24/192 to begin with.
So what's compromized?
Note also that MLP is more efficent if stereo is encoded in substream one and the additional mc content in substream two.
So you're calculation holds little value to draw definite conlusions for the titles listed.
Frank
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Hardly serious dealbreakers. - Frank.. 04:23:08 10/25/04 (32)
- It gets better . . . - Martin419 05:05:44 10/25/04 (31)
- What both you and Frank seem to miss is that ... - Christine Tham 13:42:16 10/25/04 (23)
- Sorry, how stupid of me to mis your fabricated Warner 'norm' :) - Frank.. 05:26:25 10/26/04 (5)
- You obviously don't own many Warner discs then :-) - Christine Tham 05:54:48 10/26/04 (4)
- Would not call that a 'norm'. - Frank.. 07:23:44 10/26/04 (3)
- ALERT! "Tortured justification" in progress :-) - Christine Tham 14:12:05 10/26/04 (2)
- And does it hurt Christine? :-) (nt) - Frank 01:57:54 10/27/04 (1)
- Only when I laugh (nt) - Christine Tham 02:27:58 10/27/04 (0)
- Some points . . . - Martin419 03:40:55 10/26/04 (16)
- Re: Some points . . . - Christine Tham 04:34:20 10/26/04 (15)
- "I struggle to understand your comment about backward compatibility. " - Frank.. 02:13:25 10/27/04 (4)
- so, do we know that HD-DVD uses the same file structure? - Christine Tham 02:36:27 10/27/04 (3)
- Re: so, do we know that HD-DVD uses the same file structure? - Frank.. 04:00:23 10/27/04 (2)
- so, you were just guessing then? :-) - Christine Tham 13:39:16 10/27/04 (1)
- Nope... - Frank... 14:28:22 10/27/04 (0)
- Re: Some more points . . . - Martin419 05:58:31 10/26/04 (9)
- Re: Some more points . . . - Christine Tham 06:08:22 10/26/04 (8)
- Re: Some more points . . . - Martin419 07:26:51 10/26/04 (7)
- Re: Some more points . . . - Christine Tham 13:03:18 10/26/04 (6)
- Re: iLink - John Kotches 10:53:16 10/27/04 (3)
- 2 is 1 short of a minimum of 3 - but i acknowledge your point ... - Christine Tham 13:35:03 10/27/04 (2)
- Re: 2 is 1 short of a minimum of 3 - but i acknowledge your point ... - Martin419 04:51:18 10/28/04 (0)
- Re: 2 is 1 short of a minimum of 3 - but i acknowledge your point ... - John Kotches 14:34:16 10/27/04 (0)
- Re: Some more points . . . - Martin419 16:15:09 10/26/04 (1)
- OK, let's leave it at that - we do appear to be substantially agreeing so it's just semantics (nt) - Christine Tham 16:19:34 10/26/04 (0)
- "Consumer" format - racerguy 07:47:17 10/25/04 (6)
- Universal probably figures ? - Frank.. 10:03:58 10/25/04 (5)
- Re: Universal probably figures ? - racerguy 10:34:16 10/25/04 (4)
- Still fabricating your spins.. - Frank.. 01:11:34 10/26/04 (3)
- You should do a better job - racerguy 05:53:16 10/26/04 (2)
- You should read more carfully.. (nt) - Frank.. 07:30:02 10/26/04 (1)
- You should take spelling lessons :-) (nt) - racerguy 07:50:51 10/26/04 (0)