In Reply to: Re: You probably missed it...(link) posted by Christine Tham on June 18, 2004 at 03:20:38:
***No I wasn't. You were the one who said it was "impossible" to reach 20kHz at full dynamic range. but clearly the technology to do so was there in the 70s.***No you didn't get my point or are twisting my words.
I said it is impossible to reach 20kHz at the full dynamic range *you* claimed. (80..90dB)Fancy audiophile pressings are limited by the cutting heads limitations just as much as normal pressings.
If hf content is pushed to hard then the cutting head gets into trouble.***So then it's not impossible to have extended frequency response and dynamic range, then, as you originally claim?
***Yep, flat response up to 50kHz? Simply not possible.
The encoded quad info in the disc beyond 20Khz had a lower level.Frank
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: You probably missed it...(link) - Frank.. 10:58:55 06/18/04 (3)
- Re: You probably missed it...(link) - Christine Tham 15:43:56 06/18/04 (2)
- You're diverting the issue.. - Frank.. 12:38:47 06/19/04 (1)
- the point was .. - Christine Tham 00:39:44 06/20/04 (0)