In Reply to: Did you actually read the AES paper? (nt) posted by Christine Tham on June 14, 2004 at 06:25:20:
But this paper is a sideline in this discussion.I do recognize that the resulting signal is different from the actual sample value due to the reconstruction filter.
This really means that you simply can't tell much by comparing a graph of a wav that indicates sample values.
That's one off the reasons why I can't dismiss the minimum RMS power and maximum RMS power values. IMO these values ar more telling.
PS. The differences really are minute and could creep in anywhere in the transfer mastering stage and also your soundcard and the used software.
Frank
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Not yet.... - Frank.. 07:38:44 06/14/04 (10)
- Try reading the AES paper before posting any further (nt) - Christine Tham 14:05:33 06/14/04 (8)
- Found it. - Frank.. 06:24:13 06/15/04 (7)
- Thanks for taking the effort to find it and read it - Christine Tham 16:40:58 06/15/04 (6)
- Re: Thanks for taking the effort to find it and read it - Frank.. 01:01:42 06/16/04 (5)
- Re: Thanks for taking the effort to find it and read it - Dan Banquer 02:18:32 06/16/04 (1)
- Sadly... - Frank.. 03:06:53 06/16/04 (0)
- Re: Thanks for taking the effort to find it and read it - Christine Tham 01:29:10 06/16/04 (2)
- Believe what you like... - Frank.. 03:11:53 06/16/04 (1)
- Re: Believe what you like... - Christine Tham 04:43:44 06/16/04 (0)
- If someone Googles "Diana Krall" and finds this thread, they're in for a surprise ( nt :) - Eric LeRouge 08:37:51 06/14/04 (0)