In Reply to: Re: DVD-A was produced to posted by racerguy on May 24, 2004 at 17:27:41:
"It's a DVD. There is DVD-V because there's not enough room to fit the "A" if there is "V" on it. There is DVD-A because there's not enough room to fit the "V" if there is "A" on it. If both could fit, there would be no need for a DVD-A (or a DVD-V) because it would just be DVD."
Yes, but you have forgotten that both formats did not come out at the same time. So by you simplifing in such terms as above, that scenario could not have been possible anyway. The distinction between the two would still have to be made for all sorts of reasons.Rick
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: DVD-A was produced to - Soundgarden 06:15:47 05/25/04 (5)
- Re: DVD-A was produced to - racerguy 09:20:20 05/25/04 (4)
- Re: DVD-A was produced to - Soundgarden 09:59:46 05/25/04 (3)
- Re: DVD-A was produced to - racerguy 18:12:27 05/25/04 (2)
- Getting back to my - Soundgarden 19:48:21 05/25/04 (1)
- OK, fine - racerguy 14:32:04 05/26/04 (0)