In Reply to: depending on what "superior" refer to and what format you compare with..yes it is... posted by NonA on April 25, 2004 at 08:36:27:
Good God, man! Post your system, and get some help soon! :-)
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- "the softened, edgeless, forgiving, compressed, sand-brushed, fake cymbal, sound out of SACD." - Methos 20:31:11 04/25/04 (30)
- ive heard SACD over different systems cant rationalize its failure by blaming the gear..nt - NonA 05:38:27 04/26/04 (29)
- Any system on which SACD sounds as crappy as you claim it does, has serious issues. - Methos 08:57:02 04/26/04 (28)
- Re: Any system on which SACD sounds as crappy as you claim it does, has serious issues. - Martin419 09:03:55 04/26/04 (27)
- Yes, it could have been...if you and NonA were doing the listening, and you were told which encoding method was DSD... - Methos 09:08:08 04/26/04 (26)
- dont monkeys have good hearing :)?...like i said, the problems with SACD go beyond.. - NonA 09:29:49 04/26/04 (25)
- Has SACD's claims of greater dynamic range be proven? - Duilawyer 17:56:08 04/26/04 (24)
- Re: Has SACD's claims of greater dynamic range be proven? - Frank. 23:41:26 04/26/04 (23)
- somebody was eating a sandwich in the back of the hall... - tunenut 17:40:40 04/27/04 (0)
- that's the venue ambience, not noise - Christine Tham 03:19:09 04/27/04 (21)
- Nice try. - Frank. 05:45:57 04/27/04 (20)
- yes, but was the pcm from a live recording ... - Christine Tham 06:36:11 04/27/04 (19)
- It's included in the format. - Frank. 10:45:19 04/27/04 (18)
- well, think about it ... - Christine Tham 14:03:05 04/27/04 (14)
- Re: well, think about it ... - Frank. 14:32:31 04/27/04 (13)
- no - but i don't believe the "sacd is inherently flawed" crap either :-) (nt) - Christine Tham 16:37:19 04/27/04 (12)
- Why not take the same experiment? - Eric LeRouge 01:59:53 04/28/04 (11)
- PS. Gain miust be applied before AD conversion... - Frank 05:06:39 04/28/04 (4)
- Sorry, I missed that part. - Eric LeRouge 05:45:57 04/28/04 (3)
- Re: Sorry, I missed that part. - Frank. 07:11:49 04/28/04 (2)
- Re: Sorry, I missed that part. - Eric LeRouge 07:42:28 04/28/04 (1)
- Re: Sorry, I missed that part. - Frank. 10:17:56 04/28/04 (0)
- what experiment? - Christine Tham 03:47:41 04/28/04 (5)
- We have no way of telling the results - Eric LeRouge 05:24:47 04/28/04 (2)
- will be interested in your results... - tunenut 11:00:09 04/28/04 (1)
- You need some serious help... - Frank. 01:50:31 04/29/04 (1)
- Show some public results where this has been done... - Frank. 04:28:35 04/28/04 (1)
- Re: Show some public results where this has been done... - Christine Tham 13:57:19 04/28/04 (0)
- Interesting!!! - Eric LeRouge 12:33:03 04/27/04 (2)
- Well... - Frank. 12:46:07 04/27/04 (1)
- Re: Well... - Eric LeRouge 01:25:08 04/28/04 (0)