In Reply to: Re: Is DVD-Audio more expensive for publishers? posted by Andre Yew on March 17, 2004 at 13:12:52:
>Authoring a DVD-A can be expensive because of the extras that could be included on DVD-A.<The key words being "can" and "could". How about saying SACD is less expensive because of the things that can't be done, such as no DVD-Video compatible multi-channel and no extras.
Producing a fully-featured DVD-Audio disc can be more expensive than an SACD, but it doesn't have to be. There are no requirements for any video or any extras, there isn't even a requirement for Dolby Digital or DVD-Video compatible PCM, in which case a DVD-Audio project becomes far easier to produce and no more expensive than an SACD version.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Is DVD-Audio more expensive for publishers? - NotMe 09:40:27 03/19/04 (1)
- Re: Is DVD-Audio more expensive for publishers? - Eric LeRouge 10:47:50 03/19/04 (0)