|
Critic's Corner Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry. |
|
|
|
Critic's Corner Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry. |
|
In Reply to: RE: There's an aspect to this MQA controversy which is both curious and entertaining... posted by John Atkinson on December 12, 2017 at 16:25:15:
>Your math needs work. There are many reviewers who have commented favorably
>on MQA, not just 2. And please note that some of the most vociferous critics
>of MQA have, by their own admission, not auditioned MQA files or done any
>comparisons.
Atkinson - your skills in comparison need work: how many reviewers have compared MQA vs original using the same master in controlled tests?
Secondly the fact that many critics haven't auditioned MQA-files is precisely for that reason: legit comparisons are made impossible by MQA. As many critics point out it's hence pretty much worthless to listen to MQA files for assessing the "quality" of MQA.
It's not that enough people have asked to set up such tests.
How about you report about that?!
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: There's an aspect to this MQA controversy which is both curious and entertaining... - mcgilroy 02:04:45 12/13/17 (2)
- RE: There's an aspect to this MQA controversy which is both curious and entertaining... - Dale Clark 09:39:08 12/16/17 (0)
- "legit comparisons are made impossible by MQA" - Beetlemania 08:04:03 12/13/17 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
