![]() |
Critic's Corner Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry. |
Register / Login
|
In Reply to: A not so simple plan... posted by mkuller on March 8, 2007 at 16:55:47:
That's a bummer.What it says is that without this "subsidy," the reviewers would not find reviewing "worth their time."
It says that the magazines are essentially taking advantage of a perquisite in order to cut their cost and "indirectly" raise the compensation package for reviewers.
So, would "buying at accomodation pricing" be considered part of their salary?
I hope that's not the case.
That would be as bad for the industry as anything I can think of...it would lead to a situation where the gear chosen for review could based on personal desire (avarice) rather than chosing amongst representative samples of the marketplace's products.
The feeling I get from Stereophile's reviewers is that this is not the case. I hope I'm right. Stereophile's reviewers, as a group, seem to show genuine interest in examining the broader marketplace - their fascination with Musical Fidelity not withstanding. ;)
However, and I know this is often called "jealousy," but it's not; when a reviewer pays an amount different than is representative of the marketplace and says, "So good, I bought it," it means less to me.
Now, if a reviewer said, "This product is so good, I paid what you'd have to pay for it," that would mean more!
Value statements lose some of their weight when someone is saying, "The Caliburn is awesome, I was willing to pay almost 30% of retail for it!"
For that reason, purchase price info would be cool to include for purposes of seeing what gear is really "worth" to a reviewer.
(No flames or ill intention intended.)
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Without the ability to purchase at accomodation prices...few would be willing to do it... - Enophile 19:48:04 03/08/07 (24)
- Accomodation pricing... - mkuller 09:40:21 03/09/07 (0)
- False dichotomy - Jim Austin 04:05:08 03/09/07 (22)
- Re: False dichotomy - bjh 04:47:32 03/09/07 (21)
- Who ever claimed... - Jim Austin 07:37:29 03/09/07 (19)
- Re: Who ever claimed... - bjh 08:57:41 03/09/07 (2)
- Re: Who ever claimed... - Jim Austin 11:23:00 03/09/07 (1)
- Accommodation pricing is available to online journals... - David W. Robinson 13:36:51 03/09/07 (0)
- consistant equipment swapping is the goal? - jdouglas51 08:44:17 03/09/07 (2)
- Not sure I get your point. - Jim Austin 08:53:42 03/09/07 (1)
- Re: Not sure I get your point. - jdouglas51 09:13:36 03/09/07 (0)
- P.S. - Jim Austin 07:43:52 03/09/07 (12)
- the view as an insider - jdouglas51 08:56:18 03/09/07 (11)
- Re: the view as an insider - Jim Austin 09:15:15 03/09/07 (10)
- Re: the view as an insider - bjh 09:25:01 03/09/07 (9)
- Not that I've ever been tempted, but... - Jim Austin 09:30:03 03/09/07 (8)
- Re: Not that I've ever been tempted, but... - jdouglas51 10:09:28 03/09/07 (6)
- Maybe I'm missing this... - robert young 13:24:12 03/10/07 (2)
- the distributuon chain - jdouglas51 06:44:44 03/11/07 (1)
- The cost of doing business... - robert young 11:21:10 03/11/07 (0)
- That's a fair point... - Jim Austin 10:23:09 03/09/07 (2)
- Re: That's a fair point... - Charles Hansen 13:52:00 03/09/07 (1)
- Yep, that's them. - Jim Austin 14:01:48 03/09/07 (0)
- "I'm afraid I don't get your implication. "... I feign surprise. nt - bjh 09:54:38 03/09/07 (0)
- exactly - jdouglas51 05:36:39 03/09/07 (0)