Home Critic's Corner

Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry.

You're kidding, right? Some quotes of your "reviews:"

I'm fine with whatever ya wanna say about gear, but what you write are not "reviews?"

Some examples:

"Earlier I reported on Gordon Lewis’ silver interconnects imaginatively called The Perfect Foil. And I liked them very much. Having now compared these to stiffer competition (which shall remain nameless, sorry!), that impression is reinforced. Also I remarked that his speaker cables seemed promising, although I had only heard the lesser version. Today, however, I own the middle level "AG#4" which consists of four-per-run fine-grade silver foils floating loosely in tubes (i.e., in an air dielectric, very important I think). And they are very, very good."

Here, you even call yourself a "reviewer:"

"Currently I am enamored of silver foil and even of silver rod sometimes, and this multi-silver-foil air-dielectric cable from Lewis Laboratories is performing magnificently for me. In fact it has displaced my long-regarded (in audio temporal terms anyway) Synergistic Designer Reference — still a great cable for bass — but overall, and especially in the "vital midrange" as we parrot reviewers like to say, it can’t command the candlepower to illuminate the music equally."

More...

"That said, the Dangles are Lloyd’s own and very much worth (at this time) the price asked, $295 the pair. Or put it this way: their impact surpasses many speaker cable upgrades that cost one or two thousand more."

All apologies if you were kidding, but you seem to write "reviews" and call yourself a "reviewer" alot.

(No flame intended, just clarifying.)


This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
  VH Audio  


Follow Ups Full Thread
Follow Ups


You can not post to an archived thread.