Critic's Corner Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry.

For Sale Ads FAQ / News / Events

Welcome! You must be a registered Inmate to post in this Asylum.  
Be civil and respectful or be gone.

AudioAsylum Trader Schiit Lyr - Model# SCH03 Rev. C, High Power Hybrid Dynamically... NAD C326BEE - NAD C326BEE Integrated Amplifier in excellent cosm...

• LA Weekly:Master archiiving. No mention of MQA - Isaak J. Garvey 15:47:45 11/24/16 (3)
  • Great link, should be on Tape Trail. (nt) - Dave Pogue 04:17:08 11/26/16 (0)
  • RE: LA Weekly:Master archiiving. No mention of MQA - fantja 05:42:56 11/25/16 (1)
    • RE: LA Weekly:Master archiiving. No mention of MQA - Isaak J. Garvey 07:44:26 11/25/16 (0)
• The price, all I want is the darn price.... - Smelly_Socks 13:37:50 11/16/16 (4)
  • RE: Google is your friend, list $3995. But some deals - Jeff Starr 00:21:50 11/17/16 (2)
    • RE: Google is your friend, list $3995. But some deals - Jeffrey Lee 17:51:54 11/17/16 (1)
      • Logic? where is logic in leaving out the price in a review? and tossing IN the prices of a dozen other items? - Smelly_Socks 19:13:25 11/17/16 (0)
  • +1 n/t - PAR 16:16:26 11/16/16 (0)
• Blind testing assumes that one steps in the same river twice - Jay Buridan 14:46:05 11/07/16 (81)
  • Complete nonsense - Analog Scott 13:31:31 11/19/16 (7)
    • So, DBT audio judgement is more reliable than sighted? - Jay Buridan 19:38:40 11/19/16 (6)
      • Heraclitus didn't have powerful statistical analytics. (NT) - Kal Rubinson 14:01:57 11/20/16 (0)
      • RE: So, DBT audio judgement is more reliable than sighted? - Analog Scott 20:13:20 11/19/16 (4)
        • RE: So, DBT audio judgement is more reliable than sighted? - Inmate51 08:47:31 01/06/17 (1)
          • "The man acknowledges climate change" really? - Analog Scott 06:18:16 01/21/17 (0)
        • RE: So, DBT audio judgement is more reliable than sighted? - John Atkinson 15:21:57 11/26/16 (1)
          • RE: So, DBT audio judgement is more reliable than sighted? - Analog Scott 18:05:18 11/26/16 (0)
  • RE: Blind testing assumes that one steps in the same river twice - Pat D 19:17:55 11/17/16 (1)
    • Rather than claiming, I'm asking a question - Jay Buridan 10:19:35 11/18/16 (0)
  • RE: Blind LISTENING is where it is at... earplugs and muffs. plus humming the whole time.. - Smelly_Socks 19:16:00 11/17/16 (1)
    • My friend, you should found an audio journal :) - Jay Buridan 10:29:47 11/18/16 (0)
  • Blind dogs don't bark at shadows - Jay Buridan 11:03:30 11/12/16 (0)
  • Hifitommy... - kerr 07:11:46 11/11/16 (27)
    • Dan, it was audioreview.com - hifitommy 13:38:50 11/13/16 (17)
      • RE: Dan, it was audioreview.com - kerr 14:10:44 11/14/16 (16)
        • Now - E-Stat 15:06:00 11/14/16 (15)
          • RE: Now - kerr 04:09:49 11/15/16 (14)
            • H2 - hifitommy 08:52:03 11/17/16 (4)
              • H2. Home for a small band of idiots posing as weekend scientists - Analog Scott 14:05:06 11/19/16 (1)
                • H2. Home for a small band of idiots - hifitommy 21:52:34 11/19/16 (0)
              • I'm just happy... - kerr 12:06:32 11/17/16 (1)
                • You are frequently reminded - E-Stat 09:49:30 11/18/16 (0)
            • Oh, my - E-Stat 06:31:01 11/15/16 (8)
              • Gotta love objectivist on objectivist forum violence - Analog Scott 14:08:14 11/19/16 (0)
              • LMAO!!!!! - kerr 12:19:45 11/15/16 (6)
                • Isn't that link a gem? - E-Stat 13:56:25 11/15/16 (5)
                  • A quitessential example of the disconnect between objectivists and their pet peeve... - Analog Scott 14:15:52 11/19/16 (0)
                  • RE: Isn't that link a gem? - SpotcheckBilly12345 07:03:59 11/16/16 (1)
                    • RE: Isn't that link a gem? - kerr 13:21:28 11/16/16 (0)
                  • This militant mediocrist-on-militant mediocrist violence must stop!!! (nt) - kerr 14:37:32 11/15/16 (1)
                    • LOL!!! -nt - E-Stat 15:46:39 11/15/16 (0)
    • My point is that blind and sighted testing are unreliable in different ways - Jay Buridan 18:18:05 11/11/16 (8)
      • RE: My point is that blind and sighted testing are unreliable in different ways - kerr 13:56:33 11/14/16 (0)
      • blind and sighted - hifitommy 13:34:07 11/13/16 (0)
      • RE: My point is that blind and sighted testing are unreliable in different ways - hahax@verizon.net 19:01:56 11/11/16 (5)
        • RE: My point is that blind and sighted testing are unreliable in different ways - andy_c 23:36:52 11/24/16 (0)
        • I like the speakers that Toole designed for Infinity - Jay Buridan 11:00:13 11/12/16 (3)
          • Toole didn't design any Infinity speakers, or any Harman speakers for that matter (nt) - andy_c 23:56:28 11/24/16 (1)
            • You're right. Designer was Allan Devantier - Jay Buridan 04:58:44 11/25/16 (0)
          • holding the bag (their bags)... Ouch! - hifitommy 13:35:25 11/13/16 (0)
  • I tried double blind testing but - Pjay 11:50:50 11/10/16 (1)
    • Ouch! - Jay Buridan 17:59:14 11/11/16 (0)
  • Ironically, the medical "gold standard" shares little in common with audio trials - E-Stat 06:59:33 11/08/16 (5)
    • It isn't just the "nedical gold standard. It's the scientific gold standard - Analog Scott 13:37:48 11/19/16 (4)
      • RE: It isn't just the "nedical gold standard. It's the scientific gold standard - geoffkait 17:38:14 11/24/16 (1)
        • RE: It isn't just the "nedical gold standard. It's the scientific gold standard - Analog Scott 17:25:45 11/25/16 (0)
      • So, hi-fi is a science? - Jay Buridan 19:41:27 11/19/16 (1)
        • neither. It's marketing slogan - Analog Scott 20:25:52 11/19/16 (0)
  • Blind testing, like any testing, is not foolproof. Nt - geoffkait 03:24:11 11/08/16 (13)
    • RE: Blind testing, like any testing, is not foolproof. Nt - hahax@verizon.net 05:22:46 11/08/16 (12)
      • RE: Blind testing, like any testing, is not foolproof. Nt - geoffkait 05:27:54 11/08/16 (11)
        • RE: Blind testing, like any testing, is not foolproof. Nt - hahax@verizon.net 12:14:43 11/08/16 (10)
          • Blind testing is a hypothesis test and has the same mathematical rules - Timbo in Oz 19:02:17 11/08/16 (9)
            • RE: Blind testing is a hypothesis test and has the same mathematical rules - geoffkait 05:41:44 11/09/16 (8)
              • Go jump in the lake, Geoff. - Timbo in Oz 00:29:11 11/10/16 (7)
                • Is that your best argument? - geoffkait 04:22:13 11/10/16 (6)
                  • It wasn't an argument it was a suggestion - Analog Scott 14:19:20 11/19/16 (5)
                    • RE: It wasn't an argument it was a suggestion - geoffkait 16:58:45 11/23/16 (3)
                      • RE: It wasn't an argument it was a suggestion - Analog Scott 14:03:38 11/24/16 (2)
                        • RE: It wasn't an argument it was a suggestion - geoffkait 03:57:57 11/25/16 (1)
                          • Is that your best argument? - Analog Scott 10:04:32 11/25/16 (0)
                    • you got it in one, and most music isn't made up of sustained notes, - Timbo in Oz 22:25:13 11/19/16 (0)
  • I'm curious - 4everyoung 02:43:44 11/08/16 (2)
    • My wishes are modest - DAP 07:21:30 11/12/16 (1)
      • RE: My wishes are modest - Pat D 06:01:11 11/14/16 (0)
  • RE: Blind testing assumes that one steps in the same river twice - MackRetep 21:31:42 11/07/16 (1)
    • RE: Blind testing assumes that one steps in the same river twice - davidandcandy@gmail.com 17:36:07 11/08/16 (0)
  • RE: Blind testing assumes that one steps in the same river twice - hahax@verizon.net 19:59:34 11/07/16 (5)
    • Please elaborate on circular reasoning - Jay Buridan 21:17:33 11/07/16 (4)
      • I know it's real because I hear it. I know I hear it because it's real - Analog Scott 13:49:05 11/19/16 (0)
      • RE: Please elaborate on circular reasoning - hahax@verizon.net 05:21:11 11/08/16 (2)
        • I know what circular reasoning is - Jay Buridan 19:23:31 11/19/16 (0)
        • Found it - Jay Buridan 19:18:28 11/19/16 (0)
  • Long term listening is the only correct evaluation! - RealStereo 19:28:25 11/07/16 (5)
    • nah.... - Analog Scott 13:44:19 11/19/16 (2)
      • It takes time to KNOW you will be happy! nt - RealStereo 17:57:04 11/21/16 (1)
        • Not everyone - Analog Scott 02:07:43 11/22/16 (0)
    • +1 (nt) - mkuller 13:04:43 11/13/16 (0)
    • Roger that! - Jay Buridan 21:21:28 11/07/16 (0)
  • RE: Blind testing assumes that one steps in the same river twice - oldmkvi 19:24:21 11/07/16 (0)
• MQA ready loudspeakers - Kloss 06:42:15 11/03/16 (9)
  • Sure that's not an ATMOS rig? * - Billy Wonka 16:52:43 11/03/16 (0)
  • RE: MQA ready loudspeakers - SpotcheckBilly12345 08:17:16 11/03/16 (0)
  • But do they have - 4everyoung 08:13:07 11/03/16 (2)
    • Cyroed MQA - Kloss 13:59:04 11/03/16 (0)
    • RE: But do they have - mkuller 11:33:46 11/03/16 (0)
  • RE: MQA ready loudspeakers - The Dill 07:02:00 11/03/16 (3)
    • RE: MQA ready loudspeakers - 4everyoung 08:44:50 11/03/16 (1)
      • RE: MQA ready loudspeakers - The Dill 09:14:43 11/03/16 (0)
    • RE: MQA ready loudspeakers - Kloss 07:04:43 11/03/16 (0)
• On the blurriness of MQA - Dave_K 12:38:32 11/02/16 (13)
  • Guys, pleeeze... - 13th Duke of Wymbourne 18:46:13 11/02/16 (3)
    • I'll stick to the technical points then - Dave_K 08:57:34 11/03/16 (2)
      • RE: I'll stick to the technical points then - 13th Duke of Wymbourne 15:07:29 11/03/16 (1)
        • RE: I'll stick to the technical points then - Dave_K 12:30:14 11/08/16 (0)
  • RE: On the blurriness of MQA - mkuller 12:46:44 11/02/16 (8)
    • MQA compression is lossy - Dave_K 14:59:27 11/02/16 (1)
      • RE: MQA compression is lossy - mkuller 16:41:25 11/02/16 (0)
    • RE: On the blurriness of MQA - BubbaMike 13:08:13 11/02/16 (5)
      • The point of these points is lost on me. - PAR 01:16:04 11/03/16 (4)
        • The point is to discuss the merits of an emerging product that is starting to penetrate the market - Dave_K 11:07:23 11/03/16 (1)
          • RE: The point is to discuss the merits of an emerging product that is starting to penetrate the market - fmak 12:06:10 11/03/16 (0)
        • What is the point - fmak 07:31:32 11/03/16 (1)
          • Hear, hear! - Doug Schneider 07:34:23 11/03/16 (0)
• How about a separate-but-equal MQA Forum so the Experts can argue in private. Right - oldmkvi 04:37:06 10/31/16 (11)
  • RE: How about a separate-but-equal MQA Forum so the Experts can argue in private. Right - BubbaMike 13:06:34 11/02/16 (0)
  • Separate is never equal,...(nt) - mkuller 08:21:09 11/02/16 (0)
  • RE: How about a separate-but-equal MQA Forum so the Experts can argue in private. Right - Frihed89 02:43:46 11/02/16 (0)
  • Can't wait until they get around to climate-change, immigration and religion (nt) - 13th Duke of Wymbourne 12:33:00 10/31/16 (0)
  • How about Whiner's Woad? (n/t) - trav 07:03:23 10/31/16 (3)
    • That's where my last post about the Rendu went. MQA - oldmkvi 06:17:30 11/01/16 (1)
      • Agreed! (n/t) - trav 07:17:54 11/01/16 (0)
    • Or Prop Head. nt - Rick W 07:55:16 10/31/16 (0)
  • RE: How about a separate-but-equal MQA Forum so the Experts can argue in private. Right - RhythmDevil 06:38:03 10/31/16 (0)
  • RE: How about a separate-but-equal MQA Forum so the Experts can argue in private. Right - The Dill 05:42:51 10/31/16 (0)
  • Actually, The Critics Forum is good. I can skip it altogether this way. nt - oldmkvi 04:39:48 10/31/16 (0)
• Hey JimiAustin: MQA Enabled ADCs - Isaak J. Garvey 22:49:49 10/30/16 (9)
  • RE: Hey JimiAustin: MQA Enabled ADCs - 13th Duke of Wymbourne 18:09:21 10/31/16 (4)
    • RE: Hey JimiAustin: MQA Enabled ADCs - Jim Austin 15:40:10 11/01/16 (0)
    • RE: MQA Enabled ADCs - John Atkinson 09:29:45 11/01/16 (2)
      • RE: MQA Enabled ADCs - 13th Duke of Wymbourne 18:15:35 11/02/16 (0)
      • RE: MQA Enabled ADCs - bjh 20:18:49 11/01/16 (0)
  • RE: Hey JimiAustin: MQA Enabled ADCs - Jim Austin 18:00:31 10/31/16 (2)
    • Ah - fmak 05:44:44 11/01/16 (1)
      • RE: Ah - Jim Austin 15:46:16 11/01/16 (0)
  • ADCs - fmak 03:21:00 10/31/16 (0)
• Stereophile: Get your story straight on MQA Please - Isaak J. Garvey 13:04:39 10/30/16 (101)
  • RE: Stereophile: Get your story straight on MQA Please - John Atkinson 08:22:58 11/02/16 (2)
    • RE: Stereophile: Get your story straight on MQA Please - Isaak J. Garvey 09:29:24 11/02/16 (0)
    • RE: Stereophile: Get your story straight on MQA Please - Isaak J. Garvey 08:31:56 11/02/16 (0)
  • RE: Stereophile: Get your story straight on MQA Please - John Atkinson 04:32:33 11/02/16 (1)
    • RE: Stereophile: Get your story straight on MQA Please - Isaak J. Garvey 07:36:13 11/02/16 (0)
  • RE: Stereophile: Get your story straight on MQA Please - Jim Austin 16:16:01 11/01/16 (0)
  • RE: Stereophile: Get your story straight on MQA Please - fmak 13:51:18 10/30/16 (94)
    • RE: Stereophile: Get your story straight on MQA Please - Isaak J. Garvey 16:02:13 10/30/16 (0)
    • RE: Stereophile: Get your story straight on MQA Please - Michael Lavorgna 14:12:44 10/30/16 (89)
      • http://www.audioasylum.com/forums/critics/messages/8/84563.html - fmak 22:51:44 10/30/16 (88)
        • Thanks Fred - Michael Lavorgna 05:46:47 10/31/16 (87)
          • I typically do not read forums - fmak 07:25:08 10/31/16 (1)
            • Cute, Fred. - Michael Lavorgna 07:37:49 10/31/16 (0)
          • Dreaming in Technicolor... - Doug Schneider 06:06:37 10/31/16 (84)
            • RE: Dreaming in Technicolor... - Michael Lavorgna 06:16:51 10/31/16 (83)
              • As for Reviewing... - Doug Schneider 06:37:13 10/31/16 (55)
                • I bought mine - Jim Austin 18:36:40 11/01/16 (0)
                • RE: As for Reviewing... - Michael Lavorgna 06:40:11 10/31/16 (53)
                  • RE: As for Reviewing... - Doug Schneider 06:57:14 10/31/16 (52)
                    • RE: As for Reviewing... - Michael Lavorgna 07:07:47 10/31/16 (51)
                      • RE: As for Reviewing... - Doug Schneider 07:12:16 10/31/16 (50)
                        • there's an obvious alternative. - Jim Austin 18:38:53 11/01/16 (43)
                          • Why not? - Doug Schneider 08:11:01 11/02/16 (42)
                            • RE: Why not? - Jim Austin 08:54:13 11/02/16 (41)
                              • Link to JAES paper - Michael Lavorgna 11:24:11 11/02/16 (1)
                                • Thanks Michael (nt) - Jim Austin 11:25:26 11/02/16 (0)
                              • On subjects other than MQA - Doug Schneider 09:24:34 11/02/16 (34)
                                • Not a question of space - Jim Austin 11:07:58 11/02/16 (33)
                                  • RE: Not a question of space - Doug Schneider 15:29:16 11/02/16 (32)
                                    • RE: Not a question of space - Jim Austin 15:46:41 11/02/16 (30)
                                      • RE: Not a question of space - Doug Schneider 15:59:36 11/02/16 (29)
                                        • RE: Not a question of space - Jim Austin 16:06:27 11/02/16 (28)
                                          • RE: Not a question of space - Doug Schneider 16:14:09 11/02/16 (27)
                                            • Sound On Sound... - Michael Lavorgna 16:42:10 11/02/16 (23)
                                              • RE: Sound On Sound... - John Atkinson 04:35:34 11/03/16 (0)
                                              • RE: Sound On Sound... - Isaak J. Garvey 17:14:53 11/02/16 (21)
                                                • RE: Sound On Sound... - Michael Lavorgna 17:22:49 11/02/16 (20)
                                                  • RE: Sound On Sound... - Isaak J. Garvey 17:32:09 11/02/16 (19)
                                                    • Sound On Sound...I can't recall - fmak 08:45:55 11/03/16 (7)
                                                      • You clearly have not read... - Michael Lavorgna 08:54:22 11/03/16 (6)
                                                        • RE: You clearly have not read... - fmak 10:14:54 11/03/16 (5)
                                                          • Correcting you... - Michael Lavorgna 13:55:26 11/03/16 (4)
                                                            • RE: Correcting you...What is to correct - fmak 22:53:55 11/04/16 (3)
                                                              • "The definition of insanity... - Michael Lavorgna 10:04:54 11/06/16 (2)
                                                                • RE: "The definition of insanity... - SpotcheckBilly12345 10:17:05 11/06/16 (1)
                                                                  • My welcome? - Michael Lavorgna 10:29:28 11/06/16 (0)
                                                    • How many threads... - Michael Lavorgna 17:40:38 11/02/16 (10)
                                                      • RE: How many threads... - Isaak J. Garvey 17:47:43 11/02/16 (9)
                                                        • Jsut curious... - Michael Lavorgna 17:59:14 11/02/16 (2)
                                                          • RE: Jsut curious... - Isaak J. Garvey 18:29:00 11/02/16 (1)
                                                            • RE: Jsut curious... - Michael Lavorgna 18:40:08 11/02/16 (0)
                                                        • RE: How many threads... - Michael Lavorgna 17:56:46 11/02/16 (5)
                                                          • Not paying attention - John Atkinson 04:31:39 11/03/16 (0)
                                                          • RE: How many threads... - Isaak J. Garvey 18:23:40 11/02/16 (3)
                                                            • RE: How many threads... - Michael Lavorgna 18:30:43 11/02/16 (2)
                                                              • RE: How many threads... - Isaak J. Garvey 18:39:38 11/02/16 (1)
                                                                • RE: How many threads... - Michael Lavorgna 18:41:27 11/02/16 (0)
                                            • RE: Not a question of space - Jim Austin 16:16:56 11/02/16 (2)
                                              • RE: Not a question of space - Doug Schneider 16:20:05 11/02/16 (1)
                                                • RE: Not a question of space - Jim Austin 16:23:22 11/02/16 (0)
                                    • RE: Not a question of space - Doug Schneider 15:45:05 11/02/16 (0)
                              • RE: Why not? - Doug Schneider 09:17:46 11/02/16 (3)
                                • RE: Why not? - Jim Austin 11:05:07 11/02/16 (0)
                                • RE: Why not? - Isaak J. Garvey 09:35:45 11/02/16 (1)
                                  • RE: Why not? - Doug Schneider 09:38:58 11/02/16 (0)
                        • RE: As for Reviewing... - Michael Lavorgna 07:33:55 10/31/16 (1)
                          • RE: As for Reviewing... - Doug Schneider 07:47:28 10/31/16 (0)
                        • RE: As for Reviewing... - Isaak J. Garvey 07:18:02 10/31/16 (3)
                          • RE: As for Reviewing... - Doug Schneider 07:24:31 10/31/16 (2)
                            • RE: As for Reviewing... - Isaak J. Garvey 07:27:05 10/31/16 (1)
                              • RE: As for Reviewing... - Doug Schneider 07:46:37 10/31/16 (0)
              • RE: Dreaming in Technicolor... - Doug Schneider 06:26:34 10/31/16 (26)
                • RE: Dreaming in Technicolor... - Michael Lavorgna 06:35:24 10/31/16 (25)
                  • RE: Dreaming in Technicolor... - Doug Schneider 06:51:57 10/31/16 (24)
                    • Another example-This is your "comparison''? - fmak 07:53:16 10/31/16 (14)
                      • RE: Another example-This is your "comparison''? - Mercman 08:19:29 10/31/16 (7)
                        • RE: Another example-This is your "comparison''? - fmak 08:29:48 11/02/16 (6)
                          • RE: Another example-This is your "comparison''? - Michael Lavorgna 10:55:30 11/02/16 (0)
                          • RE: Another example-This is your "comparison''? - Mercman 10:28:55 11/02/16 (4)
                            • I am reviewing the review - fmak 12:30:35 11/02/16 (3)
                              • RE: I am reviewing the review - Michael Lavorgna 12:59:51 11/02/16 (0)
                              • RE: I am reviewing the review - Mercman 12:38:54 11/02/16 (1)
                                • RE: I am reviewing the review - fmak 12:14:28 11/03/16 (0)
                      • RE: Another example-This is your "comparison''? - Michael Lavorgna 08:13:30 10/31/16 (0)
                      • RE: Another example-This is your "comparison''? - Doug Schneider 07:54:48 10/31/16 (4)
                        • RE: Another example-This is your "comparison''? - fmak 09:28:42 10/31/16 (3)
                          • You can't please everyone, Fred. - Michael Lavorgna 10:21:17 10/31/16 (2)
                            • RE: You can't please everyone, Fred. -well - fmak 22:53:22 10/31/16 (1)
                              • RE: You can't please everyone, Fred. -well - Michael Lavorgna 04:19:17 11/01/16 (0)
                    • RE: Dreaming in Technicolor... - Michael Lavorgna 07:29:08 10/31/16 (8)
                      • RE: Dreaming in Technicolor... - John Atkinson 09:04:15 10/31/16 (5)
                        • Passive-aggressive behavior - Michael Lavorgna 15:44:08 10/31/16 (2)
                          • aggressive behavior - fmak 05:05:57 11/01/16 (1)
                            • I am here... - Michael Lavorgna 07:48:20 11/01/16 (0)
                        • About Comparisons... - Doug Schneider 10:18:22 10/31/16 (0)
                        • RE: Dreaming in Technicolor... - Doug Schneider 10:11:04 10/31/16 (0)
                      • RE: Dreaming in Technicolor... - Doug Schneider 07:45:15 10/31/16 (1)
                        • Show Report v Review - Michael Lavorgna 07:49:46 10/31/16 (0)
    • RE: Stereophile: Get your story straight on MQA Please - Isaak J. Garvey 14:05:49 10/30/16 (2)
      • RE: Stereophile: Get your story straight on MQA Please - ahendler 17:47:42 10/30/16 (1)
        • RE: Stereophile: Get your story straight on MQA Please - Isaak J. Garvey 22:54:11 10/30/16 (0)
• The real scoop on MQA, Warner, and the other major labels - Jim Austin 08:47:42 10/29/16 (58)
  • I don't understand very much (any?) of this, BUT - Frihed89 01:50:38 10/30/16 (6)
    • RE: I don't understand very much (any?) of this, BUT - Jim Austin 05:21:24 10/30/16 (5)
      • Which we know because of Bob Stuart's/MQA's claims that you are so faithfully parroting? - bjh 08:26:36 10/30/16 (4)
        • RE: Which we know because of Bob Stuart's/MQA's claims that you are so faithfully parroting? - fmak 10:29:56 10/30/16 (3)
          • RE: Which we know because of Bob Stuart's/MQA's claims that you are so faithfully parroting? - bjh 12:48:49 10/30/16 (2)
            • RE: Which we know because of Bob Stuart's/MQA's claims that you are so faithfully parroting? - BubbaMike 13:04:48 11/02/16 (1)
              • RE: Which we know because of Bob Stuart's/MQA's claims that you are so faithfully parroting? - fmak 08:53:44 11/03/16 (0)
  • RE: The real scoop on MQA, Warner, and the other major labels - Isaak J. Garvey 14:37:47 10/29/16 (19)
    • "took a file and upsampled it or converted to another format like DSD". Blue Coast does just that. nt - oldmkvi 21:15:43 10/29/16 (1)
      • RE: "took a file and upsampled it or converted to another format like DSD". Blue Coast does just that. nt - Jim Austin 17:49:57 10/31/16 (0)
    • Agree/Disagree - Doug Schneider 15:40:19 10/29/16 (16)
      • RE: Agree/Disagree - Isaak J. Garvey 15:45:09 10/29/16 (15)
        • RE: Agree/Disagree - Doug Schneider 15:54:10 10/29/16 (14)
          • RE: Agree/Disagree - Isaak J. Garvey 15:58:43 10/29/16 (13)
            • RE: Agree/Disagree - Doug Schneider 16:02:11 10/29/16 (12)
              • RE: Agree/Disagree - Isaak J. Garvey 16:07:57 10/29/16 (11)
                • RE: Agree/Disagree - Doug Schneider 16:17:23 10/29/16 (10)
                  • RE: Agree/Disagree - Isaak J. Garvey 16:23:06 10/29/16 (9)
                    • RE: Agree/Disagree - Doug Schneider 16:27:08 10/29/16 (8)
                      • RE: Agree/Disagree - Isaak J. Garvey 16:31:27 10/29/16 (7)
                        • RE: Agree/Disagree - Doug Schneider 16:42:42 10/29/16 (6)
                          • RE: Agree/Disagree - Isaak J. Garvey 17:01:14 10/29/16 (5)
                            • exactly. - Jim Austin 20:16:30 10/29/16 (4)
                              • RE: exactly. - Isaak J. Garvey 20:34:14 10/29/16 (0)
                              • RE: exactly. - Isaak J. Garvey 20:29:10 10/29/16 (2)
                                • As he posted earlier to this effect - fmak 08:04:09 10/30/16 (1)
                                  • RE: As he posted earlier to this effect - Isaak J. Garvey 08:51:43 10/30/16 (0)
  • No numbers, no dates ...Wow! Some scoop! - bjh 14:37:08 10/29/16 (1)
    • RE: No numbers, no dates ...Wow! Some scoop! - Isaak J. Garvey 14:43:53 10/29/16 (0)
  • RE: The real scoop on MQA, Warner, and the other major labels - ahendler 09:12:22 10/29/16 (28)
    • RE: The real scoop on MQA, Warner, and the other major labels - fmak 11:20:13 10/29/16 (26)
      • RE: The real scoop on MQA, Warner, and the other major labels - Jim Austin 11:26:56 10/29/16 (25)
        • RE: The real scoop on MQA, Warner, and the other major labels - Isaak J. Garvey 14:06:20 10/29/16 (2)
          • RE: The real scoop on MQA, Warner, and the other major labels - Jim Austin 14:09:04 10/29/16 (1)
            • RE: The real scoop on MQA, Warner, and the other major labels - Isaak J. Garvey 14:12:43 10/29/16 (0)
        • Many reasons... - Doug Schneider 13:49:24 10/29/16 (19)
          • RE: Many reasons... - Jim Austin 13:58:40 10/29/16 (15)
            • RE: Many reasons... - Doug Schneider 14:12:03 10/29/16 (13)
              • So in other words ... - Jim Austin 14:22:01 10/29/16 (4)
                • RE: So in other words ... - PAR 16:06:39 10/29/16 (3)
                  • RE: So in other words ... - ahendler 18:21:11 10/29/16 (2)
                    • RE: So in other words ... - PAR 01:19:43 10/30/16 (1)
                      • owned by Naxos - fmak 08:44:41 10/30/16 (0)
              • RE: Many reasons... - Jim Austin 14:19:43 10/29/16 (7)
                • RE: Many reasons...I'm sure, 192/24 - fmak 08:41:05 10/30/16 (5)
                  • RE: Many reasons...I'm sure, 192/24 - Jim Austin 09:11:08 10/30/16 (4)
                    • MQA process appears to be accelerating the pace of digitizing analog tapes - fmak 12:49:47 10/30/16 (0)
                    • RE: Many reasons...I'm sure, 192/24 - Isaak J. Garvey 09:35:17 10/30/16 (2)
                      • RE: Many reasons...I'm sure, 192/24 - Jim Austin 09:56:03 10/30/16 (1)
                        • RE: Many reasons...I'm sure, 192/24 - Isaak J. Garvey 12:23:46 10/30/16 (0)
                • RE: Many reasons... - Doug Schneider 14:26:37 10/29/16 (0)
            • RE: Many reasons... - Isaak J. Garvey 14:10:16 10/29/16 (0)
          • RE: Many reasons... - ahendler 13:54:03 10/29/16 (2)
            • RE: Many reasons... - Jim Austin 14:02:53 10/29/16 (0)
            • RE: Many reasons... - Doug Schneider 13:56:53 10/29/16 (0)
        • RE: The real scoop on MQA, Warner, and the other major labels - bullethead 12:10:03 10/29/16 (1)
          • RE: The real scoop on MQA, Warner, and the other major labels - Jim Austin 12:12:52 10/29/16 (0)
    • RE: The real scoop on MQA, Warner, and the other major labels - Jim Austin 09:26:04 10/29/16 (0)
• MQA hype, will this kill the industry? An observation from a consumer - bullethead 06:05:47 10/29/16 (34)
  • RE: MQA hype, will this kill the industry? An observation from a consumer - X1992 16:40:23 11/03/16 (0)
  • RE: MQA hype, will this kill the industry? An observation from a consumer - Isaak J. Garvey 10:19:22 10/29/16 (4)
    • A question for Isaac - 13th Duke of Wymbourne 13:12:25 10/29/16 (3)
      • RE: A question for Isaac-I think the - fmak 03:18:09 10/30/16 (0)
      • RE: A question for Isaac - Isaak J. Garvey 14:15:55 10/29/16 (1)
        • Understood, thanks (nt) - 13th Duke of Wymbourne 19:57:40 10/29/16 (0)
  • RE: MQA hype, will this kill the industry? An observation from a consumer - Isaak J. Garvey 10:17:53 10/29/16 (1)
    • thanks for the info Isaak - bullethead 11:31:25 10/29/16 (0)
  • RE: MQA hype, will this kill the industry? An observation from a consumer - Isaak J. Garvey 10:16:43 10/29/16 (3)
    • RE: MQA hype, will this kill the industry? An observation from a consumer - Kal Rubinson 12:55:24 10/29/16 (2)
      • RE: MQA hype, will this kill the industry? An observation from a consumer - Isaak J. Garvey 14:03:07 10/29/16 (0)
      • RE: MQA hype, will this kill the industry? An observation from a consumer - bullethead 12:58:37 10/29/16 (0)
  • RE: MQA hype, will this kill the industry? An observation from a consumer - Jim Austin 08:44:46 10/29/16 (19)
    • MQA files sound very good on a good - fmak 09:22:41 10/29/16 (18)
      • RE: MQA files sound very good on a good - Jim Austin 11:48:27 10/29/16 (11)
        • RE: MQA files sound very good on a good - Isaak J. Garvey 14:20:22 10/29/16 (2)
          • RE: MQA files sound very good on a good - Jim Austin 14:52:05 10/29/16 (1)
            • RE: MQA files sound very good on a good - Isaak J. Garvey 15:19:23 10/29/16 (0)
        • RE: MQA files sound very good on a good - ahendler 13:52:47 10/29/16 (2)
          • RE: MQA files sound very good on a good - Jim Austin 14:07:33 10/29/16 (1)
            • Plenty of examples... - mlsstl 08:52:43 10/31/16 (0)
        • Link? - bullethead 13:34:07 10/29/16 (4)
          • RE: Link? - Jim Austin 13:37:52 10/29/16 (3)
            • RE: Link? - bullethead 13:44:45 10/29/16 (2)
              • RE: Link? - Jim Austin 13:47:39 10/29/16 (1)
                • RE: Link? - bullethead 14:29:23 10/29/16 (0)
      • RE: MQA files sound very good on a good - Jim Austin 09:51:29 10/29/16 (5)
        • What is there to misunderstand? - fmak 11:14:57 10/29/16 (4)
          • RE: What is there to misunderstand? - Jim Austin 11:40:59 10/29/16 (3)
            • very obviously - fmak 12:04:08 10/29/16 (2)
              • RE: very obviously - Jim Austin 12:05:36 10/29/16 (1)
                • Be polite, or be gone - fmak 21:47:48 10/29/16 (0)
  • RE: MQA hype, will this kill the industry? An observation from a consumer - SpotcheckBilly12345 07:04:55 10/29/16 (1)
    • RE: MQA hype, will this kill the industry? An observation from a consumer - bullethead 07:07:16 10/29/16 (0)
• Blind Testing - John Atkinson 04:13:08 10/28/16 (49)
  • RE: Blind Testing - fstein 17:59:09 10/28/16 (0)
  • Why would you eliminate those two? - mkuller 08:43:12 10/28/16 (3)
    • RE: Why would you eliminate those two? - John Atkinson 09:58:01 10/28/16 (2)
      • Let me get this straight: - b.l.zeebub 13:39:58 10/29/16 (0)
      • But isn't that an issue with any blind listening test? (nt) - mkuller 13:40:46 10/28/16 (0)
  • My Mistake... - Doug Schneider 05:11:31 10/28/16 (33)
    • RE: My Mistake... - Peter Breuninger 15:05:25 10/28/16 (0)
    • RE: My Mistake... - Isaak J. Garvey 07:31:59 10/28/16 (0)
    • RE: My Mistake... - Michael Lavorgna 07:16:01 10/28/16 (30)
      • Comparisons/Marketing/Etc. - Doug Schneider 08:13:48 10/28/16 (15)
        • RE: Comparisons/Marketing/Etc. - Michael Lavorgna 08:46:06 10/28/16 (13)
          • RE: Comparisons/Marketing/Etc. - Peter Breuninger 15:08:23 10/28/16 (0)
          • RE: Comparisons/Marketing/Etc. - Doug Schneider 09:19:42 10/28/16 (11)
            • RE: Comparisons/Marketing/Etc. - Michael Lavorgna 13:44:09 10/28/16 (1)
              • RE: Comparisons/Marketing/Etc. - Doug Schneider 14:19:39 10/28/16 (0)
            • RE: Comparisons/Marketing/Etc. - ahendler 11:11:54 10/28/16 (8)
              • What!!! No Crying?? No Fits of Ecstasy?? Nothing like that video on the MQA site? No birth of new world? nt - bjh 14:26:57 10/28/16 (0)
              • Great Story -- But Small Differences Again... - Doug Schneider 11:56:43 10/28/16 (6)
                • RE: Great Story -- But Small Differences Again... - ahendler 14:19:55 10/28/16 (1)
                  • RE: Great Story -- But Small Differences Again... - Doug Schneider 14:32:05 10/28/16 (0)
                • RE: Great Story -- But Small Differences Again... - Isaak J. Garvey 12:02:43 10/28/16 (3)
                  • RE: Great Story -- But Small Differences Again... - Doug Schneider 12:12:45 10/28/16 (1)
                    • RE: Great Story -- But Small Differences Again... - Isaak J. Garvey 12:16:59 10/28/16 (0)
                  • I wonder how much Robert Harley was paid? - hawkmoon 12:11:03 10/28/16 (0)
        • Well said - fmak 08:21:36 10/28/16 (0)
      • RE: My Mistake... - Isaak J. Garvey 07:20:37 10/28/16 (13)
        • RE: My Mistake... - Michael Lavorgna 07:22:58 10/28/16 (12)
          • I typically do not read forums - fmak 07:52:10 10/28/16 (4)
            • I've found - Jim Austin 09:16:36 10/28/16 (1)
              • We have - fmak 03:58:47 10/29/16 (0)
            • RE: I typically do not read forums - Michael Lavorgna 07:56:01 10/28/16 (1)
              • I write about audio, not psychology - fmak 08:20:42 10/28/16 (0)
          • RE: My Mistake... - Isaak J. Garvey 07:28:05 10/28/16 (6)
            • RE: My Mistake... - Mercman 09:57:21 10/28/16 (4)
              • RE: My Mistake... - Isaak J. Garvey 10:00:14 10/28/16 (3)
                • RE: My Mistake... - Mercman 10:01:08 10/28/16 (2)
                  • RE: My Mistake... - Isaak J. Garvey 10:02:51 10/28/16 (1)
                    • RE: My Mistake... - Mercman 10:04:05 10/28/16 (0)
            • RE: My Mistake... - Michael Lavorgna 07:30:35 10/28/16 (0)
  • RE: Blind Testing - John Atkinson 04:33:32 10/28/16 (9)
    • I think I'm the source of the "misinformation" :) - E-Stat 07:09:09 10/28/16 (8)
      • Which is the reason MQA only works for files and not CD-type discs - John Marks 07:28:19 10/28/16 (7)
        • RE: Which is the reason MQA only works for files and not CD-type discs - Doug Schneider 08:19:53 10/28/16 (0)
        • RE: Which is the reason MQA only works for files and not CD-type discs - John Atkinson 07:45:40 10/28/16 (5)
          • RE: Which is the reason MQA only works for files and not CD-type discs - Doug Schneider 08:23:56 10/28/16 (4)
            • RE: Which is the reason MQA only works for files and not CD-type discs - John Atkinson 08:28:10 10/28/16 (3)
              • RE: Which is the reason MQA only works for files and not CD-type discs - Doug Schneider 08:32:17 10/28/16 (2)
                • The biggest problem with MQA is .. - 13th Duke of Wymbourne 12:42:48 10/28/16 (1)
                  • it is too clever for most to understand - fmak 10:29:31 11/05/16 (0)
• Hey! Where did Isaak's 'pimping' post go? - Michael Lavorgna 19:48:53 10/27/16 (0)
• So If MQA Really Performs Digital Magic.... - Isaak J. Garvey 14:06:16 10/27/16 (1)
  • RE: So If MQA Really Performs Digital Magic.... - Jim Austin 19:04:25 10/27/16 (0)
• How do YOU feel about MQA? - Doug Schneider 14:26:16 10/26/16 (70)
  • RE: How do YOU feel about MQA? - Inmate51 10:05:33 01/02/17 (0)
  • RE: How do YOU feel about MQA? - josh358 06:14:03 10/30/16 (0)
  • I don't care....just another way..... - StevieRay 13:46:01 10/28/16 (0)
  • RE: How do YOU feel about MQA? - Michael Lavorgna 18:41:27 10/27/16 (22)
    • RE: How do YOU feel about MQA? - Doug Schneider 19:51:01 10/27/16 (21)
      • RE: How do YOU feel about MQA? - Michael Lavorgna 19:56:13 10/27/16 (20)
        • RE: How do YOU feel about MQA? - Doug Schneider 20:01:02 10/27/16 (11)
          • RE: How do YOU feel about MQA? - Michael Lavorgna 20:05:35 10/27/16 (10)
            • RE: How do YOU feel about MQA? - Doug Schneider 20:09:38 10/27/16 (9)
              • RE: How do YOU feel about MQA? - Michael Lavorgna 20:13:14 10/27/16 (8)
                • RE: How do YOU feel about MQA? - Doug Schneider 20:14:41 10/27/16 (7)
                  • RE: How do YOU feel about MQA? - Michael Lavorgna 20:17:55 10/27/16 (6)
                    • RE: How do YOU feel about MQA? - Doug Schneider 20:21:33 10/27/16 (5)
                      • RE: How do YOU feel about MQA? - Michael Lavorgna 20:25:05 10/27/16 (4)
                        • RE: How do YOU feel about MQA? - Doug Schneider 20:27:33 10/27/16 (3)
                          • RE: How do YOU feel about MQA? - Michael Lavorgna 20:29:02 10/27/16 (2)
                            • RE: How do YOU feel about MQA? - Doug Schneider 20:30:52 10/27/16 (1)
                              • RE: How do YOU feel about MQA? - Michael Lavorgna 20:37:49 10/27/16 (0)
        • RE: How do YOU feel about MQA? - Isaak J. Garvey 19:59:07 10/27/16 (7)
          • RE: How do YOU feel about MQA? - Michael Lavorgna 20:01:00 10/27/16 (6)
            • RE: How do YOU feel about MQA? - Isaak J. Garvey 20:04:06 10/27/16 (5)
              • RE: How do YOU feel about MQA? - Michael Lavorgna 20:09:09 10/27/16 (4)
                • RE: How do YOU feel about MQA? - Isaak J. Garvey 20:21:01 10/27/16 (3)
                  • RE: How do YOU feel about MQA? - Michael Lavorgna 20:33:35 10/27/16 (2)
                    • RE: How do YOU feel about MQA? - Isaak J. Garvey 20:37:45 10/27/16 (1)
                      • RE: How do YOU feel about MQA? - Michael Lavorgna 20:41:40 10/27/16 (0)
  • RE: How do YOU feel about MQA? - Peter Breuninger 12:07:25 10/27/16 (7)
    • RE: How do YOU feel about MQA? - Isaak J. Garvey 12:53:41 10/27/16 (6)
      • Larger files -- a problem? - Doug Schneider 13:04:37 10/27/16 (5)
        • MQA is what Redbook should have been... - tketcham 15:42:29 10/27/16 (3)
          • RE: MQA is what Redbook should have been...Remaster - fmak 05:47:02 10/29/16 (2)
            • RE: MQA is what Redbook should have been...Remaster - tketcham 08:29:32 10/29/16 (1)
              • An example - fmak 03:23:00 10/30/16 (0)
        • RE: Larger files -- a problem? - Peter Breuninger 13:32:37 10/27/16 (0)
  • RE: How do YOU feel about MQA? - Mercman 11:06:40 10/27/16 (0)
  • RE: How do YOU feel about MQA? - Jim Treanor 10:55:12 10/27/16 (0)
  • Whatever happened to HDCD? (nt) - mkuller 10:51:55 10/27/16 (1)
    • RE: Whatever happened to HDCD? - whitedragem 02:42:20 01/02/17 (0)
  • Just a curiosity - E-Stat 09:30:00 10/27/16 (3)
    • And we all know what happened to the qøl Signal Completion Stage... - Steve O 11:17:52 10/27/16 (2)
      • Exacatacaly! - E-Stat 13:28:06 10/27/16 (1)
        • ... and Stereophile are the new Chumps! nt - bjh 16:39:19 10/27/16 (0)
  • It doesn't exist enough for me to have feelings about it - trav 09:20:25 10/27/16 (0)
  • I feel that the name itself couldn't be worse. - Dave Pogue 06:14:29 10/27/16 (0)
  • RE: How do YOU feel about MQA? - fmak 23:55:10 10/26/16 (1)
    • RE: How do YOU feel about MQA? - ahendler 07:13:05 10/27/16 (0)
  • RE: How do YOU feel about MQA? - mlsstl 19:29:47 10/26/16 (3)
    • Actually - Jim Austin 05:48:29 10/27/16 (2)
      • I seriously doubt... - mlsstl 16:32:12 10/27/16 (1)
        • AMEN (nt) - StevieRay 13:48:37 10/28/16 (0)
  • RE: How do YOU feel about MQA? - Isaak J. Garvey 14:56:08 10/26/16 (5)
    • RE: How do YOU feel about MQA? - Jim Austin 05:55:31 10/27/16 (1)
      • RE: How do YOU feel about MQA? - Isaak J. Garvey 07:19:48 10/27/16 (0)
    • FWIW, I download DSD. (NT) - Kal Rubinson 15:06:56 10/26/16 (2)
      • RE: FWIW, I download DSD. (NT) - Isaak J. Garvey 15:13:58 10/26/16 (1)
        • Yup. Old story. - Kal Rubinson 05:16:12 10/27/16 (0)
  • RE: How do YOU feel about MQA? - ahendler 14:36:49 10/26/16 (13)
    • RE: How do YOU feel about MQA? - Isaak J. Garvey 14:59:43 10/26/16 (12)
      • RE: How do YOU feel about MQA? - Jim Austin 05:56:29 10/27/16 (3)
        • RE: How do YOU feel about MQA? - ahendler 07:16:44 10/27/16 (2)
          • RE: How do YOU feel about MQA? - Jim Austin 07:25:33 10/27/16 (1)
            • RE: How do YOU feel about MQA? - Isaak J. Garvey 07:34:47 10/27/16 (0)
      • RE: How do YOU feel about MQA? - ahendler 19:04:28 10/26/16 (7)
        • RE: How do YOU feel about MQA? - Isaak J. Garvey 07:16:47 10/27/16 (2)
          • RE: How do YOU feel about MQA? - ahendler 07:19:44 10/27/16 (1)
            • RE: How do YOU feel about MQA? - Isaak J. Garvey 07:33:11 10/27/16 (0)
        • Hope that's a typo - Jim Austin 05:45:48 10/27/16 (3)
          • RE: Hope that's a typo - ahendler 07:18:40 10/27/16 (2)
            • RE: Hope that's a typo - Jim Austin 07:24:49 10/27/16 (1)
              • RE: Hope that's a typo - ahendler 21:54:35 10/28/16 (0)
• Audiostream backracking on MQA - fmak 09:23:08 10/25/16 (16)
  • backracking. Really? - Michael Lavorgna 18:35:13 10/27/16 (9)
    • RE: backracking. Really? - Mr_Steady 07:55:43 10/28/16 (3)
      • RE: backracking. Really? - Michael Lavorgna 07:57:56 10/28/16 (2)
        • RE: backracking. Really? - Mr_Steady 08:04:13 10/28/16 (1)
          • RE: backracking. Really? - fmak 04:05:21 10/29/16 (0)
    • RE: backracking. Really? - fmak 06:07:51 10/28/16 (4)
      • RE: backracking. Really? - Michael Lavorgna 06:29:27 10/28/16 (3)
        • Really? - fmak 10:20:03 10/28/16 (2)
          • RE: Really? - Michael Lavorgna 13:46:35 10/28/16 (1)
            • RE: Really? You are - fmak 21:49:44 10/28/16 (0)
  • RE: Audiostream backtracking on MQA - John Atkinson 16:07:03 10/25/16 (4)
    • RE: Audiostream backtracking on MQA And - fmak 22:00:32 10/25/16 (0)
    • RE: Audiostream backtracking on MQA - Isaak J. Garvey 17:12:33 10/25/16 (2)
      • RE: Audiostream backtracking on MQA - John Atkinson 04:05:13 10/26/16 (1)
        • RE: Audiostream backtracking on MQA - Isaak J. Garvey 15:17:56 10/26/16 (0)
  • RE: Audiostream backracking on MQA - Isaak J. Garvey 12:56:34 10/25/16 (0)
• TAVES - nvinyl66 09:57:55 10/22/16 (4)
  • RE: TAVES - John Atkinson 12:53:29 10/22/16 (2)
    • RE: TAVES - nvinyl66 17:30:16 10/22/16 (1)
      • RE: TAVES - John Atkinson 16:43:28 10/23/16 (0)
  • it was because of the... - hifitommy 11:03:51 10/22/16 (0)
• Stereophiles review of Auditorium 23 - Kloss 07:10:11 10/20/16 (5)
  • RE: Stereophiles review of Auditorium 23 - dbphd 18:48:53 10/28/16 (0)
  • Is Line Magnetic making repro tungars?... - Steve O 08:24:36 10/20/16 (3)
    • RE: Is Line Magnetic making repro tungars?... - Kloss 09:00:32 10/20/16 (2)
      • RE: Is Line Magnetic making repro tungars?... - Steve O 12:24:49 10/20/16 (1)
        • RE: Is Line Magnetic making repro tungars?... - mkuller 11:17:29 10/24/16 (0)
• Didn;t notice any free Absolute Sound Mags at RMAF.... - Ivan303 06:47:52 10/09/16 (11)
  • RE: Didn;t notice any free Absolute Sound Mags at RMAF.... - fantja 11:42:57 10/11/16 (0)
  • RE: Didn;t notice any free Absolute Sound Mags at RMAF.... - John Atkinson 08:13:55 10/09/16 (9)
    • I have attended every RMAF since the first one (2003?)... - Ivan303 15:57:34 10/09/16 (8)
      • RE: I have attended every RMAF since the first one (2003?)... - John Atkinson 08:00:45 10/13/16 (2)
        • I covered the first RMAF for Stereophile - Peter Breuninger 07:10:28 10/16/16 (0)
        • I'll take your word for it.. - Ivan303 14:48:31 10/14/16 (0)
      • RE: I have attended every RMAF since the first one (2003?)... - -æ- 16:51:30 10/10/16 (2)
        • Ah yes... - Ivan303 17:56:45 10/10/16 (1)
          • RE: Ah yes... - -æ- 15:51:23 10/11/16 (0)
      • Won't they have the Marriott finished by then? (nt) - mkuller 08:05:42 10/10/16 (1)
        • Rooms will be smaller due to changes in the ventilation system... - Ivan303 17:44:57 10/10/16 (0)
• Dynaudio Focus 360 Review - Freo-1 11:49:41 10/08/16 (2)
  • RE: Dynaudio Focus 360 Review - Jeffrey Lee 08:54:56 10/10/16 (1)
    • RE: Dynaudio Focus 360 Review - Freo-1 10:03:51 10/10/16 (0)
• Glad to see Stereophile Recommended Components Back Up to 500!! (nt) - gregwalshfmc@gmail.com 07:14:41 10/01/16 (13)
  • RE: Glad to see Stereophile Recommended Components Back Up to 500!! (nt) - John Atkinson 07:55:05 10/02/16 (11)
    • I have to comment on the cables though. Seems no order or logic, just crap someone has used.. - Smelly_Socks 12:00:43 10/05/16 (3)
      • RE: I have to comment on the cables though. Seems no order or logic, just crap someone has used.. - Jeffrey Lee 12:14:34 10/05/16 (2)
        • e curious about a certain cable, just Google the damn thing. - Smelly_Socks 16:24:59 10/06/16 (1)
          • RE: e curious about a certain cable, just Google the damn thing. - Makes sense - Jeff Starr 20:24:37 10/11/16 (0)
    • 698? That's a lot of advertisers! - Ivan303 17:35:54 10/02/16 (0)
    • RE: Glad to see Stereophile Recommended Components Back Up to 500!! (nt) - semuta 14:27:54 10/02/16 (5)
      • RE: Glad to see Stereophile Recommended Components Back Up to 500!! (nt) - John Atkinson 12:59:35 10/05/16 (4)
        • RE: Glad to see Stereophile Recommended Components Back Up to 500!! (nt) - semuta 17:17:08 10/05/16 (0)
        • RE: Glad to see Stereophile Recommended Components Back Up to 500!! (nt) - gregwalshfmc@gmail.com 15:50:25 10/05/16 (2)
          • RE: Glad to see Stereophile Recommended Components Back Up to 500!! (nt) - John Atkinson 17:36:22 10/06/16 (1)
            • RE: Glad to see Stereophile Recommended Components Back Up to 500!! (nt) - stereo5 17:01:34 10/14/16 (0)
  • RE: Glad to see Stereophile Recommended Components Back Up to 500!! (nt) - fantja 14:47:03 10/01/16 (0)

Threads started on or before 3/31/07 are archived Here.
Threads started on or before 3/15/07 are archived Here.
Threads started on or before 2/28/07 are archived Here.
Threads started on or before 2/15/07 are archived Here.
Threads started on or before 1/31/07 are archived Here.

---

[ Top of Page ] [ Contact Us ] [ Support/Wish List ] [ Copyright © 2017, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ] [ Take5 ]

---

[ General ] [ Speakers ] [ Tubes ] [ Vinyl ] [ Digital ] [ Hi-Rez ] [ Video Asylum ] [ Cables ] [ Tweaks/DIY ] [ Music ] [ Films ]

---