|
Planar Speaker Asylum Welcome! Need support, you got it. Or share your ideas and experiences. |
|
|
|
Planar Speaker Asylum Welcome! Need support, you got it. Or share your ideas and experiences. |
|
In Reply to: 3.5 vs 3.6 differences in sound posted by 66mgb on February 21, 2011 at 08:57:14:
Russ: I have owned both for several years. They are close in sound but there is a noticeable difference. The 3.5s are a little warmer and forgiving and a little less transparent than the 3.6s. I also think the 3.6s are a touch more immediate - you don't have to play them quite so loud. I can't say I noticed a difference in bass but I've then I've used giant subs you see here with both.
Some may actually like the 3.5s better but they are not quite as neutral. I think you could be very happy with either model and for many trading up might not be worth it. Find the first Absolute Sound review of the 3.6s when they came out as there's a comparison of the two. The reviewer nailed this question precisely.
Oh, the 3.6s are a bitch to bi-amp and require lots of tinkering where as the 3.5s are almost a set and forget affair.
Barry
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: 3.5 vs 3.6 differences in sound - Barry 20:22:21 02/21/11 (1)
- RE: 3.5 vs 3.6 differences in sound - 66mgb 08:24:53 02/22/11 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2025, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
